Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

label
Page Properties

Status

Status
colourGreen
titleDecided

Decision leader

Paul Hoang (Unlicensed)

Contributors

TIS Team

Date

Outcome

Message bus is the agreed way forward. PoC carried out successfully.

Background

Outcome of this spike 09/01/2019:

...

  • Already carried out in Sept 2018 – The outcome was it is achievable, tested with 10K requests and all of them received. TISNEW-2402

Options considered

Option 1:

Option 2:

Description

Continue without a message bus

Implement a message bus

Pros and cons

POSITIVES

No dev work required.

NEGATIVES

No queuing means potential for duplications being added, especially via bulk upload function. No traceability. No restartability.

POSITIVES

Addresses all the negatives from Option #1.

Future-proofs our development approach further.

Could be rolled out elsewhere - e.g. in place of ETLs with the NDW team.

NEGATIVES

Is a not insignificant amount of development.

Need to source the appropriate software to use.

Unclear the overall cost of implementation (time and money).

Estimated cost

Status
colourYellow
titleMEDIUM
 (Time and Effort)

Problems with discovering and having to fix duplicates caused because of the lack of message bus.

Status
colourRed
titleLARGE
 (Time and Cost)

Status

Status
colourYellow
titleIn progress

Status
colourRed
titleto do

Action items

  •  Tickets for separate areas where this could be applied so that PO’s can prioritise – Add to Epic TISNEW-2396
  •  Use TISNEW-2401 to help with spiking and creating further tickets

...