...
- ITP posts are GP focused
- Definition of ITP posts is to be agreed
- ITP Posts Vs Accrued Annual Leave
- Dave Rayner gave a description of ITP posts being one where there is splitting of sites and is a complex post
- 'Main site' and 'Other sites' recorded within placement is not currently sufficient to capture such Post/Placement
- Ability to record multiple funding within the Post
- Naming of the 'Other sites' was raised as a possibility to record ITP, however James mentioned that this should not be confused with the actual purpose of recording 'Other site' on TIS for GP posts.
- An Additional Site within Placement/Post raised as a suggestion for recording ITP.
- London have Posts specific to record ITP placements
- ITP is for Placement not Posts.
- Local variations is okay if it satisfies the below:
- Consistent Recording across Regions
- Ability to report Nationally
Placement types (additional)
- Period of Grace - no additional type required
- Accrued Period of Leave
- Taken after parental leave for GPs
- Trusts are required to know
- Needed for Public health as well (London SE)
- How to record this and is it actually needed? Is there a possible national requirement?
- It was agreed for this to be looked at how to record this at a Regional Level on TIS
- How many Local Offices have a Lead Employer?
- How is this information recorded on ESR?
- Positions can be recorded on ESR with Lead or Host Employer information, however this is not consistently being recorded on ESR.
- Where this detail exists and positions have been created with, these flow in the TIS-ESR interface
...