Welcome
- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!; |
|---|
Live Issues:
| Incident logs New incidents this |
|---|
Iteration |
Person Placement Employing Body Trust sync job failed affecting Person Search Leftover incidents where mitigations were completed this Iteration |
Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no reference to specific Jira tickets, and no reference to work not 'done')
Area | Description | Team Representative | Demo - from Prod URL where feasible |
|---|---|---|---|
TISSS | Implement sign-up and sign-in via an authenticator app |
Trainee’s FormRs added to metabase for rudimentary reporting | |||
Large trusts able to be synced without manual intervention | Some trusts were too large to be properly handled by the self-service sync process, which keeps trainee data up to date with TIS changes. A workaround was available but this required manual intervention and monitoring by the TIS team. Trainee data related to trust changes are now individually queued and the update is then done one-by-one so that all updates can eventually be processed. | ||
Reval | “Last update” column was not getting updated in the Recommendation summary page |  Short Demo | |
“Actual Submission date” is replicating the “GMC Submission due date” | “Actual Submission date” is not appearing as the correct one. It is replicating the “GMC Submission Due date”  The above demo will cover this at the same time. | ||
Recommendation search with invalid GMC number | Before:  After:  | ||
Recommendation comments with HTML format | Before:  After:  | ||
TIS | |||
ESR | Unable to delete old positions | Narrative: It was possible to have multiple records for an “ESR Position” which caused problems when we then try to refer to the position. For example, when ESR notified us the position should be deleted we were unable to identify a single position to delete. We have recreated an index which enforces uniqueness in ESR positions. | |
Several little hurdles investigated and rectified where necessary | Some updates to ContactDetails that failed to be recorded on TIS in July have been finally carried out. | ||
NIMDTA | Corrections to trainee status | Trainee status is not editable on the front-end, but some historic data required correction. 9 ‘inactive’ trainees with ongoing programme memberships were made current, and 2248 ‘current’ trainees with no ongoing programme membership were set to inactive. | |
Objective Key Results (OKRs) 2021/22 Q2:
OKR | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th |
Objective: Solve MFA and prepare for the second live pilot | |||||||
Key Result#1: Run an experiment with existing pilot Trainees on using an Authenticator App. Get sufficient feedback to develop it into a solution for the next pilot. | Too early to score | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | |
Key Result#2: | Too early to score | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | |
Key Result#3: Run the 2nd pilot to include live ARCP Form R completion via the app (with associated HEE admin unlocking of Form Rs submitted in error, if needed). | Too early to score | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | n/a | ||
0.3 | n/a | ||||||
Key Result#4: Ensure data from all fields in Form R is stored in a format enabling it to be extracted on demand for the purposes of reporting. | Too early to score | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
Following on from a TISSS call (2021-08-17) where it was confirmed that running the 2nd TISSS pilot within this Quarter was not going to be possible, we removed it from the KR list for our OKRs. Spare effort we have as a result will go towards supporting other services and looking at where we can take KR#4.
Reinstated KR#3 as we have been able to begin the 2nd Pilot this Quarter. Well done everyone involved!
...
TIS Dev team roadmap:
| Trello card | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Feedback
We really do welcome any feedback you have for us - whether it be negative or positive, or whether it be a suggestion of something we could try/incorporate in a future Review. We absolutely don’t want to stand still. We’re very happy applying the 12th Agile principle of ‘becoming more productive’ to our Reviews themselves! Your contributions to this survey are entirely anonymous, should you wish to include anything others might perceive as controversial. We welcome any and all feedback, as long as it is constructive!
Post-Review survey: https://healtheducationyh.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/tis-review-2021-2-q2-iteration6 |
|---|