Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

Authors

Status

Resolved

Summary

  • Ran the GMC SYNC ETL and INTREPID REVAL ETLs (intrepid-reval-etl  and intrepid-reval-etl-all-prod)

  • We didn't bother adding monitoring to the existing sync jobs as new revalidation is soon going to be live

  • Do need to add monitoring to sync jobs and ETLs for new revalidation - https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3264

Impact

Non-technical summary

Timeline

-09:48 AM

- 10:25 AM

Created ticket and incident page https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-5728

2020-11-18 Reval Legacy/Old GMC Sync

- Between 10:25 and 11:21

Ran the jobs intrepid-reval-etl and intrepid-reval-etl-all-prod

Fixed the refresh of data but difference between the under notice values between TIS legacy/existing reval and GMC Connect

12:06

Ran the GMC Sync and intrepid-reval-etl-all-prod  again via Jenkins

12:25

Seems to be fixed

Root Causes

  • TBD

Trigger

  • User reported in Teams Support Channel that their connections had not been working correctly

Resolution

  • Running of the Sync, intrepid-reval-etl and intrepid-reval-etl-all-prod jobs

Detection

  • User reported in Teams Support Channel

Actions

Lessons Learned (Good and Bad)

  • Still limited knowledge within the existing teams about how the existing module exists

  • Need monitoring - we raised this on August 22, 2019 and still have not done it

  • Jobs need to be run via Jenkins

  • intrepid-reval-etl builds the ETL?

  • No labels