Attendees: Alistair Pringle (Unlicensed), Sue Barrand (Unlicensed), James Harris, Andy Horton (Unlicensed), David Short (Unlicensed), Chris Norman (Unlicensed), Adewale Adekoya, Ashley Ransoo

Discussion/Action :

#	Discussion/Action	Responsible	Outcome	Status
1	Resolve Duplicates - TISDEV-4841: Resolve the duplicate invalid GMC numbers, such as 'Retired,' and make them 'UNKNOWN'	Data leads	First discussed on DQ on 04/06: 08/01: TISNEW-2364 - Merging, then removal of Duplicate Person Records - Round 1 DONE - Work completed for Round 1 on Stage and testing began. Since this was a flyway script, the importance was stressed on completion of the testing on stage as this would block anything else from being released to Production in out release pipeline DS: Has done some testing. SB: leave manager tests carried out. JH/DS/AH: re-use some of the scripts that were used during consolidation for testing on metabase for next week. DS: Prog membership, placements and assessments - Looks good so far. How long more this would need? - conclude by Wed 16/01.( and are going to test this on Wednesday afternoon) 21/09: The scripts have been run on Prod over the weekend. has taken extracts of the data on Friday afternoon ahead of the scripts being run. 4/02: Round two will be needed. LaSE still to advise DS on what to do with the records that weren't an easy match. Chris picking this up - London may be ok but KSS need more attention 4/02: Leave manager - need to do checks for the circa 500 records to make sure that the round 2 de-duping would not leave orphaned records (as per the procedure for Round 1 01/04: to provide the list of Id's/template for the second round of duplication (second strongest match rule). To send the list out to all regions be checked. Jen would have done for the South - to be checked? 15/04: Still awaiting for EMD, South and London. 24/06: Jen to speak to David tomorrow (25th) re queries she has found in the South. James to ask Gwil where has gotten to with this - returns from leave on the 1st July 08/07: David to resend file to Gwil and Jen is no longer confused as she now understands that this part of the exercise will not remove ALL erroneous records. Work is continuing........ 22/07: Ongoing, waiting for South and EMD data 02/09 EM have submitted, awaiting the South (ongoing) 14/10: Back with DS - to compare and rebuild the new list of what's been merged Might be useful for bringing in the Northern Ireland data into TIS (Adewale Adekoya) 11/11: Completed by South. With David at the moment.
2	Identification and removal of Consultant data on TIS	All	Removal of consultant data has a dependency on De-duplication work. 22/10: Dependency on the De-dupe work. Follow up with Chris after the de-dupe work has taken place. This is to identify which Consultant data belongs to which Trust so that they can have this if the trust wants. 29/10: Linked to the removal of the consultant information from TIS we also need to address the issue of the non-trainee posts. So a further piece of work needs to take place to identify and hard delete these posts. Will need to take a copy of this so that (like with the non-trainee records) we can pass this to the trusts if needed. JW to create ticket related to the deletion of posts. 19/11 - Once de-dupe is done, check the full list of People from Chris. Please review against the surviving records (IDs) on TISNEW-2057. 14/01: Wait until the testing of the de-dupe has been done on stage then carry on.- 04/02: Awaiting on DS on testing outcome for TISNEW-2057 to prioritise TISNEW-2083. Does the script attached to 2083 has everything? Check with Rob about urgency of this re IG - JW to do this 01/04: to check with Rob/Ben. 15/04: response from Rob 'From an IG perspective - of we don't need it then we should not keep it.' Supervisors and Leave approvers taken into account on Chris's script. 24/06: The South has undertaken a post audit and set to Inactive Consultant/non current posts which has resulted in a reduction of approx. 2000 posts Suggestion that this is something that the other three regions can do while the Person de-dup is in the process of being completed. Suspect most of the Consultant posts in the North and Mids and East are now inactive meaning that the majority of outstanding posts belong to KSS (possibly) Once this has been completed for Posts they can remain as Inactive rather than undertake another unnecessary step. 22/07: Still waiting on the de-duplication work. To discuss about Supervisors after this piece of work.	On hold until Point 1 has been completed to the group's satisfaction for People area
3	Sites created with Trust code. Trust codes are not unique.		01/03/2019: Tom De Salis: Cleansing the NTS data revealed the fact that 3 of our CCGs merged into a super-CCG last year, which means their sites have the wrong Trust/Trust code on TIS. This is an issue on both the Site reference table and on all the posts related to these sites. It affects around 100 sites. Do we know when the post update tool might be available to update the posts? Is it worth waiting? Would we be able to do an update on the back-end to the site reference table? AR: Site is linked to Trust via the TrustId. When creating a Site, a valid Trust Code is entered and the Trust ID is fetched from the Trust reference table to attach to the Site. However, since the Trust Code is not currently unique in the Trust reference table, the site might be linked to incorrect Trusts. E.g. Trust Code RQ3: Trust Code VTS: Are these sites linked to the correct trusts ? 01/04: Check if the FE is displaying INACTIVE values when creating site. Need to understand what the problem is. to speak to Tom de Salis/invite him to the next data leads call . Raise a ticket to get the Trust search behave as the Site Search. list posted on DQ channel to be discussed. 15/04: Identify duplicate Sites (Site codes not unique) in Site Reference Table- Identify duplicate Trusts codes in Trust reference table Identify association between Current Sites to Inactive Trusts Each Region data Lead to review on DQ channel. 24/06: Regions to act on report created by Chris. Not for immediate attention due to the current work ongoing in Local Offices. 19/08: Ongoing 07/11/2019 Similar issue raised Lynn Bradley team TISNEW-3571 - Getting issue details... STATUS another ticket raised for all duplicate trust code TISNEW-3577 - Getting issue details... STATUS 11/11: Post the spreadsheet on DQ channel to sort out the duplicate Trusts codes and ensure 1 only is CURRENT for each code.	Not for immediate attention as priority in LOs is August intake and ARCPS
4	Unknown trust codes linked to Sites	Data leads	Ola spotted that there are 56 sites which have an unknown Trust code attached to them. Data leads have been asked to investigate the ones that belong to their region and update the unknown trust code with a known trust code where needed/possible (posted in Data Leads channel on the 3/6/2019) TISNEW-3041 24/06: 49 records still left to be looked at. https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/275 Regions to look at when they have the time. South has completed their part. 08/07: work ongoing 11/11: Not all sites have a trust. Those in the report above are councils and is not causing issues at the moment.	CLOSED
5	Dental data on TIS	All	24/06: No DFT in the NW and Orthodontics in KSS. 08/07: David to be in receipt of this info in near future - suspect for David to import into TIS 22/07: KSS: Nothing to be done, NW: Will be done imminently 19/08: Awaiting on NW. 30/09: It's in progress.
6	Missing data from placements is causing entire specialties not to render on the PPT FE	All	08/07: Ashley to produce a report showing any current placements are missing mandatory information so this can be added to the placements in question. 09/07:https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/279 The last column tells you what's missing. I have limited it to placements with an end date greater than 08-07-2018 assuming the placement end date itself is not missing. It is still a large number - 4546 records Placements with a missing end date and the highest start date available in the database (1/03/2017): https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/278 The solution could be to only get the PPT to show the placements for the past 24 months - AP to speak Ola about this. 19/08: Ongoing piece of work to tidy up data 11/11: Can be closed based on the above date.	CLOSED
7	Curriculum GMC Reference Number	All	19/08: Needs adding to TIS for ARCP return. Add to Assessments bulk upload. Can be done via Intrepid avoiding the need to add it to TIS Assessments upload. Add to NDW - TISNEW-1547-Assessment:CurriculumGMCReferenceNumber not in NDW TISNEW-1547 - Getting issue details... STATUS TISNEW-1538 - Getting issue details... STATUS TISNEW-1332 - Getting issue details... STATUS - Not Required 30/09: This is not in Assessment. Ticket to be tidied up: ProgrammeCurriculum needs to include another field called ProgrammeCurriculumGMCReferenceNumber both in the FE and BE. Does not need to be under Programme membership. It's like a Programme number format, 6 character format alphanumeric. (non-mandatory) This field needs to be sent to NDW. To get the data from GMC via GMC Connect, to input into this field on TIS. 29/10: DS: "...the list of programme codes is the best I'd get, there's no matrix of programme to curriculum." There are gaps for some programmes, where a GMC Curriculum Reference number could not be provided Why the gaps and why some regions/programmes have no such matrix to curriculum? Are they not being used/not required for GMC ARCP return for these programmes? 11/11 : The above tickets have been done and this is now sent to NDW. This is a non-mandatory field on the UI labelled as GMC Programme code on the UI. A spreadsheet was provided to populate where possible the GMC Programme Code. Can be closed.	CLOSED
8	Programme Admin/Observer and Trust Admin/Observer roles to be used in	Data Leads	30/09: AR: There are users on TIS that have been setup with the incorrect roles combination. e.g. HEE Admin and one of the other roles in (Trust Observer/Admin, Programme Observer/Admin) or user has HEE Admin and one of the Trust/Programme roles. To be looked at along with the User Management enhancements Tidying up of roles not needed Look at a better way of managing roles for TIS IG implications TISNEW-3372 - Getting issue details... STATUS 14/10: User management reviewed and stories for improving ahead of the above ticket being tackled. 11/11:User stories in Jira. Can be Closed.	CLOSED
9	NTN Generation	Data Leads	Training Pathways: TISNEW-3263 - Getting issue details... STATUS CCT CESR N/A - Yes for Core and Foundation Programmes CEGPR - No Any others? - No 16/09:(Ashley Ransoo) Curriculum > Leads to CCT field - This needs to be added to NDW. Needs tidying up. Following the tidying up, wherever the value is YES, it should default the Training pathway field to CCT, where No, then to N/A. - New ticket for this TISNEW-3394 - Getting issue details... STATUS TISNEW-3389 - Getting issue details... STATUS Bulk Upload - People Import to be extended (Add/Update) - Another ticket - N/A 04/11: Maria Kist (Unlicensed) asked a question about the other training pathways (...CCTi (industry), CCTn etc. and whether those should be factored into the NTN generation? 11/11: Question raised with the GMC. CCT is what the GMC/CoPMED have asked for to be recorded in the NTN and not the other sub-types. Get the latest script from James Speak with devs/include James in solution design
10	TrainingNumberAtTime to be recorded on TIS and sent to NDW for ARCP return	All/James	TISNEW-3408 - Getting issue details... STATUS TISNEW-2967 - Getting issue details... STATUS Review of how this works in the current ARCP return If the Curricula dates change how do we capture/handle this on the assessment records proactively? JH: So for the automate NTN ticket as part of refinement we need to consider how a current NTN is autogenerated but also how a future programme membership NTN is autogenerate JH: For current it is easy as just use the curricula as per today's date JH:For future I think it should be generate the NTN based upon the first day of the programme membership 14/10: For TIS: Ashley Ransoo update ticket with If the curriculum attached to the Prog membership is amended, and there are assessment records for the attached curriculum and the Review date is within the Curriculum membership start and end dates, then it should update the TrainingNumberAtTime against the assessment records. It is not run as of today but as of the Curriculum dates. Recording of the historical NTNs not required for TIS. 11/11: Ticket updated with the above. Possibility of Not having an NTN. In which case the Assessment record will end up with a null NTN. This is where the review date of the assessment is after the Programme Curricula completion date on the Prog membership when the assessment is being created.
11	Draft/Publish Placement Planning Tool (PPT)	All	TISNEW-3327 - Getting issue details... STATUS 14/10: Agreed 11/11: being worked on	CLOSED
12	Foundation - Assessments	All	Helan Raynor: Academic Foundation trainees with the additional curriculum of Academic Foundation Training: We are having problems in recording their clinical ARCPs as it is asking for the Academic Outcome on the Post-assessment detail section - is anyone else having this issue and is it actually an issue? Should we be recording this detail for our F1 trainees? Thanks in advance... Kay Appleyard: We cannot save their outcome without selecting 'continuing on academic component' - technically they don't start their academic curriculum until their F2 year and so it feels wrong to say that they are continuing when they haven't yet started it. Ideally for academic F1s we would want to be able to save their outcome without having to put anything in the Academic Outcome field. 14/10: If they are on F2 - they would have completed their academic component at the end of it. Kay to speak to other Foundation Teams. 11/11: Can be closed " Kata Varnai, Helan Raynor, Simon Hart I hadn't realised that academic was spread over 2 years in some schools, so yes I would agree with you happy to continue as is with this - thanks Kata Varnai & Gwilym Williams for your help on this."	CLOSED
13	GDC/GMC/PH with N/A values	All/AP	Do we need to review/rationalise? i.e. where there are invalid data for those. It affects seach and reporting. Should N/A be recorded within GMC number? or just UNKNOWN or an actual number? There are records of Current Persons with all 3 registration numbers being NULL https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/282 11/11: UKNOWN should be used GMC/GDC/PH number when not known N/A used for non-clinical person records Ticket up - All Blanks and N/A can be turned to UNKNOWN.
14	SuppoRTT Data Programme: Project Plan	James H/All	11/11:
15	Country - Oriel/TIS - Aligning the list. COunties that do not exist anymore to be looked at.

Browser not supported