2021/2: Q2 | Review#4 (2021-08-03 to 2021-08-17)

Welcome

Overviews of the iteration
Any interruptions / Live Defects
Team going through what they’ve achieved during the iteration
Feedback from those on the call on what we have done (constructive criticism / praise / questions)
Collaboration with those on the call on what to do next
Ask questions:

- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!;
- write in the Team meeting chat; or
- fill in the post-Review survey after the call
(for questions that occur after the call is over, or if you don’t want to ask the question during the call for whatever reason, and
for letting us know whether the Review meets your expectations, or whether you have some suggestions for improvement)

Overviews of the iteration
Any interruptions / Live Defects
Team going through what they’ve achieved during the iteration
Feedback from those on the call on what we have done (constructive criticism / praise / questions)
Collaboration with those on the call on what to do next
Ask questions:

- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!;
- write in the Team meeting chat; or
- fill in the post-Review survey after the call
(for questions that occur after the call is over, or if you don’t want to ask the question during the call for whatever reason, and
for letting us know whether the Review meets your expectations, or whether you have some suggestions for improvement)

Live Issues:

key	summary	created	updated	status

Loading...

Refresh

Incident logs

Initiated last iteration, ongoing

2021-08-02 Placements not being exported to ESR

Initiated last iteration, completed this iteration

2021-07-30 Old RabbitMQ prod broker deleted before the EsrDataExport service was moved to new RabbitMQ broker

2021-07-23 NIMDTA TIS-NDW ETL failure

Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no reference to specific Jira tickets, and no reference to work not 'done')

Area	Description	Team Representative	Demo - from Prod URL where feasible

Area	Description	Team Representative	Demo - from Prod URL where feasible
TISSS	Add filtering for the list of subspecialties in the Form R Part A Declarations Section	@Edward Barclay
Reval	Historical data migration ETL	@Doris.Wong
Reval	Fixed typo when saving a recommendation	@Andy Dingley	Previous text: Current text:
TIS / ESR	Validation for creation of current Trusts	@Andy Dingley @Marcello Fabbri (Unlicensed)	Demo from stage (change trustCode from ‘204’ to ‘15E’ and watch it not save)
	Relax work email validation (controlled by ESR)	@Joseph (Pepe) Kelly @Reuben Roberts	https://www.loom.com/share/6cf5ebc53fad4f2b8c3fa842f43b22c9 https://stage-apps.tis.nhs.uk/admin/people/person/4194/edit-personal-details
	Placement’s ESR export status accuracy corrected	@Marcello Fabbri (Unlicensed)	The ESR interface exported some placements but could not update their `esr export status` on TIS due to a live defect from the previous iteration. These placements have been manually updated to reflect the their successful export.
NIMDTA
NIMDTA

Objective Key Results (OKRs) 2021/22 Q2:

OKR	1st Iteration	2nd Iteration	3rd Iteration	4th Iteration	5th Iteration	6th Iteration	7th Iteration
Objective: Solve MFA and complete second live pilot
Key Result#1: Run an experiment with existing pilot Trainees on using an Authenticator App. Get sufficient feedback to develop it into a solution for the next pilot.	Too early to score	0.1	0.5	0.6
Key Result#2: Coordinate a 2nd pilot (confirm with teams running ARCPs - ask monthly. Any number would be insightful, ideally between 30-50).	Too early to score	0.1	0.1	0.2
Key Result#3: Run the 2nd pilot to include live ARCP Form R completion via the app (with associated HEE admin unlocking of Form Rs submitted in error, if needed).	Too early to score	0.1	0.1	0.1
Key Result#4: Ensure data from all fields in Form R is stored in a format enabling it to be extracted on demand for the purposes of reporting.	Too early to score	0.5	0.6	0.6

TIS Dev team roadmap:

Feedback

We really do welcome any feedback you have for us - whether it be negative or positive, or whether it be a suggestion of something we could try/incorporate in a future Review. We absolutely don’t want to stand still. We’re very happy applying the 12th Agile principle of ‘becoming more productive’ to our Reviews themselves! Your contributions to this survey are entirely anonymous, should you wish to include anything others might perceive as controversial. We welcome any and all feedback, as long as it is constructive!

Post-Review survey: https://healtheducationyh.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/tis-review-2021-2-q2-iteration4

Post-Review survey: https://healtheducationyh.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/tis-review-2021-2-q2-iteration4

TIS21 Confluence Space