Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Welcome

  • Overviews of the iteration

  • Any interruptions / Live Defects

  • Team going through what they’ve achieved during the iteration

  • Feedback from those on the call on what we have done (constructive criticism / praise / questions)

  • Collaboration with those on the call on what to do next

  • Ask questions:

- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!;
- write in the Team meeting chat; or
- fill in the post-Review survey after the call
(for questions that occur after the call is over, or if you don’t want to ask the question during the call for whatever reason, and
for letting us know whether the Review meets your expectations, or whether you have some suggestions for improvement)

Live Issues:

key summary created updated status
Loading...
Refresh

Incident logs

Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no reference to specific Jira tickets, and no reference to work not 'done')

Area

Description

Team Representative

Demo - from Prod URL where feasible

TISSS

Reval

“Edit Recommendation” bug

Cai Willis

When editing a recommendation, the UI wouldn’t render properly and the buttons on the page became inoperable. This happened when there were no comments attached to a particular recommendation

Extra functionality was added to account for this situation

Datepicker format quick fix

Cai Willis

When using the text input of the datepicker, it enforces a US date format despite our localization settings. We have implemented a short-term fix, disabling the text input and making the datepicker icon more obvious, and created a ticket for the long term fix (which is unfortunately fairly involved)

Recommendation submission was not working due to incorrect RO details

Jayanta Saha

Live Demo

TIS / ESR

Academic Outcome not displayed for some trainee’s assessments

Andy Dingley

If a trainee had multiple academic curriculum the academic outcome field would be displayed as blank if any of the curriculum start/end dates did not overlap with the programme start/end dates.

The logic has been corrected so the academic outcome is displayed correct if any curriculum overlap, rather than required that all curriculum overlapped.


NIMDTA

Objective Key Results (OKRs) 2021/22 Q2:

OKR

1st
Iteration

2nd
Iteration

3rd
Iteration

4th
Iteration

5th
Iteration

6th
Iteration

7th
Iteration

Objective: Solve MFA and prepare for the second live pilot

Key Result#1: Run an experiment with existing pilot Trainees on using an Authenticator App. Get sufficient feedback to develop it into a solution for the next pilot.

Too early to score

0.1

0.5

0.6

Key Result#2: Coordinate Prepare for a 2nd pilot (confirm with teams running ARCPs - ask monthly. Any number would be insightful, ideally between 30-50).

Too early to score

0.1

0.1

0.2

Key Result#3: Run the 2nd pilot to include live ARCP Form R completion via the app (with associated HEE admin unlocking of Form Rs submitted in error, if needed).

Too early to score

0.1

0.1

0.1

Key Result#4: Ensure data from all fields in Form R is stored in a format enabling it to be extracted on demand for the purposes of reporting.

Too early to score

0.5

0.6

0.6

Following on from a TISSS call (2021-08-17) where it was confirmed that running the 2nd TISSS pilot within this Quarter was not going to be possible, we removed it from the KR list for our OKRs. Spare effort we have as a result will go towards supporting other services and looking at where we can take KR#4.

TIS Dev team roadmap:

Feedback

We really do welcome any feedback you have for us - whether it be negative or positive, or whether it be a suggestion of something we could try/incorporate in a future Review. We absolutely don’t want to stand still. We’re very happy applying the 12th Agile principle of ‘becoming more productive’ to our Reviews themselves! Your contributions to this survey are entirely anonymous, should you wish to include anything others might perceive as controversial. We welcome any and all feedback, as long as it is constructive!

  • No labels