| Wants/Needs | Concerns | Quick Wins |
|---|
| Slide 1 | - UI Page instead to access further data
- Intro dashboard could adapt the page which explains all the other dashboards to create an overall introduction
- Log in dictates if you see Internal or External tool
| - What happens when response rates increase and released nationally
- What happens when the survey has done two revolutions
- Do we need it at all
- Link is broken so email better
- Add in which survey the tool links to (date)
| - HEE Branding to be better
- Contents page would be useful
- Purpose of the survey upfront
- Navigation to each area with a short description
- Last updated - Data as title
- Contact information
|
| Slide 2 | - Need an indication of response rates to show the validity
- Add a theme/indicator level under the domain
- Responders by Region - may be more useful to have response numbers vs total learners (ie. Total potential responses)
- Future - To cover all domains in questions
- Respond by Region. Change to number + Split Med and Non-Med
- Useful only to operational staff
| - Do filters filter all pages or just single page
- How will this be presented year on year
- Not measuring against all the domains
- Number of questions varies by domain (2-15) How best to summarise
- Not useful EXTERNALLY (Just more information to navigate past)
- What are our response rates? What do about non-med?
- If we get Slide 1 right we don't need this
|
|
| Summary slides | - Overall satisfaction by location (Drill down on a map)
- Rag ratings
- Positivity/negativity
- OS by Region/Trust/Programme - Drill down to see questions
- Can we RAG
- Domain useful internally at National/board level
- Question categories: eg Teaching, Supervision useful externally and Local Office level
- Would like the option to compare responses to regional mean as well as national (overall sat. by location chart)
- Ability to be able to compare results for sites as well as trusts
- Create a common NETS language (like GMC flags - or NETS flags)
- Click on a result by domain to see questions items that feed into it
- Domain level too broad 'overall Sat need to drill down to 'Supervision', 'Training' etc
- Breakdown of response has 'value' for local offices
- Can we map risk against the HEE risk matrix?
- OV Sat/OV Variance tabs would be useful if displayed by Category/Teacher/Supervision
- Results on a page. eg - for a provider - too many tabs to view all data
- If we theme the questions by Supervision etc, it may be easier to understand/more useful
- OV Variance filter by colour coding to investigate potential risk
- Introduce a slider with movable maximum and minimum to highlight the top and bottom ranges
- Domain summary - Lime the idea of having one list of questions taher than response types
- End goal - EDU Provider . can choose themselves, click download & obtain a report on themselves
- Addition of Average bar of those selected
| - Can we RAG/Categorise data in some way as GMC? (We all understand that system & so do trusts)
- Currently can't answer business questions from too!
- How do we identify the key areas of risk in these pages
- Ask National Directors how they want to analyze business risk
- How do we know which are our organizations of greatest risk? Need to agree threshold + process
- Calculation of data/scores/risk. How do we want to count? Data methodology
| Slide 12 | Slide 13- If we cant do % response rates - do no's at - National/Regional and also at Placement/Trust level
- How is this currently better than excel?
- Don't use '+ive & '-ive' as it's confusing terminology
| - Instead of an external tool can we generate a PDF report
|
| Slides 12-13 | We need to try to actually introduce a lot of this into the reporting tool, as opposed to having it as a reference at the back. The tool should be intuiative enough for users. But if not, we need tooltip areas to help users understand what things are or where things are and what they do
|