Versions Compared

Old Version 11

changes.mady.by.user Andy Nash

Saved on

compared with

New Version 12

changes.mady.by.user Andy Dingley

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Welcome

  • Overviews of the iteration

  • Any interruptions / Live Defects

  • Team going through what they’ve achieved during the iteration

  • Feedback from those on the call on what we have done (constructive criticism / praise / questions)

  • Collaboration with those on the call on what to do next

  • Ask questions:

- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!;
- write in the Team meeting chat; or
- fill in the post-Review survey after the call
(for questions that occur after the call is over, or if you don’t want to ask the question during the call for whatever reason, and
for letting us know whether the Review meets your expectations, or whether you have some suggestions for improvement)

Live Issues:

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
columnskey,summary,created,updated,status
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject = TIS21 AND issuetype = LiveDefect AND status in (Backlog, "Being code reviewed", "Check ACs", Documentation, Done, Implementing, "Measure of success", "Ready for development", Refinement, "Released to Prod", "Released to Stage", "Tests/Logs/Monitoring", "Verifying on Prod", "Verifying on Stage") AND created >= 2021-03-30 AND created <= 2021-04-13 order by created DESC
serverId4c843cd5-e5a9-329d-ae88-66091fcfe3c7

Incident logs

Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no reference to specific Jira tickets, and no reference to work not 'done')

Area

Description

Team Representative

Demo - from Prod URL where feasible

TIS

Additional Outcomes for LAT Assessments (NIMDTA only)

Joseph (Pepe) Kelly or Edward Barclay

https://www.loom.com/share/04852e9a9bca4298a24ed8d0a145b898

Reval

Trainee with expired programme membership populate from TIS to Reval Exception / Connected / Disconnected list

Doris.Wong

Live demo

ESR

TIS SS

Form R (Part A)'s “Training Grade” dropdown has the correct list of grades.

Andy Dingley

Image Added

Form R (Part A and B)'s “Specialty” fields have the correct list of values.

Andy Dingley

Image Added

Form R (Part B)'s “Previous Designated Body…” dropdown now uses DBC names instead of Local Office names. Including newly added bodies such as NIMDTA and NES.

Andy Dingley

Image Removed

Form R (Part A)'s “Training Grade” dropdown has the correct list of grades.

Andy Dingley

Image RemovedPreviously this was empty on the live environment and had a list of only three grades on the test environment.Image Added

Privacy Policy page

Programme Curricula

john o

Demo from prod

Objective Key Results (OKRs) Financial Q4

OKR

1st
Iteration

2nd
Iteration

3rd
Iteration

4th
Iteration

5th
Iteration

6th
Iteration

Objective: Support Trainees with their use of TIS Self-service

Key Result#1: No unresolved 'serious' queries (combining # of queries with their nature)

too early

Key Result#2: Trainees score overall experience and satisfaction of TIS Self-service at 6 or higher

too early

Key Result#3: 70% of Trainees engage with TIS Self-service as part of the initial pilot

too early

...

Info

*TIS Self-service MVP:
Trainees:

  • have a login to TISSS and know what to use it for, and can reset their passwords

  • can access their personal details held on TIS

  • can see their current and future Programme and curriculum membership they are training on

  • can ensure placement details are accurate and have a way of knowing where they are going to be training next

  • have visibility of their assessments including upcoming ones

  • are able to complete their Form R Parts A and B electronically

  • are able to receive support when they have queries regarding using Trainee Self Service or Submitting specific forms

HEE Admins:

  • are able to access submitted Form R's and unlock / un-submit them

TIS Dev team roadmap:

Trello card
urlhttps://trello.com/b/I2KstFzF/tis-interim-roadmap?menu=filter&filter=label:TIS%20Self-service

Feedback

We really do welcome any feedback you have for us - whether it be negative or positive, or whether it be a suggestion of something we could try/incorporate in a future Sprint Review. We absolutely don’t want to stand still. We’re very happy applying the 12th Agile principle of ‘becoming more productive’ to our Sprint Reviews themselves! Your contributions to this survey are entirely anonymous, should you wish to include anything others might perceive as controversial. We welcome any and all feedback, as long as it is constructive!

...