Page Comparison

See here for further questions… https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/l/cp/ErQEibpV

So teams can The sessions with the users were to address the Product team queries around Connections and its tabs.

...

Question/Query/Concern	Response from London	Response from Thames Valley and North West	Comment	Ticket
Why Connections?	Doctors have to be connected to BD to work as a doctor. Part of terms and condition to start training;Though this will not stop them from training. Nothing to do with ARCP but doctors must be connected Doctors are connected to their training programme	GMC expect doctors to be connected to an employer/DB Legal obligation Current way of doing it is difficult. Reconciliation of connection with GMC connect Not many use the Discrepancy report which tries to reconcile who should/shouldn't be connected Joint obligation btw Admin/Doctor to ensure correct list of connection	The Dean is the responsible officer (RO) for all trainees connected to their Designated Body. This is covered by GMC and statutory obligations. Gold Guide - https://www.copmed.org.uk/images/docs/gold-guide-9th-edition/Gold-Guide-9th-Edition-August-2022.pdf GMC - https://www.gmc-uk.org/registration-and-licensing/managing-your-registration/revalidation/revalidation-requirements-for-doctors-in-training Statutory - Medical Profession (Responsible Officers) Regulations 2010/13 (see section 13) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/144188/Annex-B-The-Medical-Profession-Responsible-Officers-Regulations-2010.pdf	No ticket/Action Required?
User Journey (Old Reval)	London not using Old Reval for Connection	No action before login into TIS-Admin Login into old TIS- Reval via TIS Admin Go to Connection discrepancies to Remove connection or create connection (this contains the list of current connection) Every month, list of discrepancies is transferred into a spreadsheet to check for more details about individual doctor in TIS Admin. Image RemovedImage Added Pain Point: Info on TIS -misleading/inaccurate Opportunity: Historic Connection in the new module/system: Might be useful for investigation. This is not available in both old TIS Reval and GMC Connect	Action: How do we minimise inaccuracy in TIS? Can we do that through logic? RP - what info on TIS is misleading / inaccurate? Meeting: Accept.	No ticket/Action Required?
User Journey (GMC Connect and TIS- Reval )	(Before login into system) Users generate mega report via NDW on who’s is finishing/CCT- ARCP outcome 6 - Run report 3 months to finishing. Each Local specialty has its spreadsheet/report Check doctors under Notice in TIS-Reval Compare the two reports (Under Notice from TIS- Reval and the Local specialty spreadsheet so see who needs connected or disconnected Login into GMC connect to do the disconnection or bring forward doctor already connected to appear under Notice No action after using the system Pain Point: People connected to wrong RO/Trust (To be considered in discrepancies) Doctor not disconnecting themselves when they finish (To be considered in discrepancies) Doctors not connecting themselves (To be considered in discrepancies). If a doctor connect himself 2 weeks or more than the programme start date - they are disconnected by Admin No way of knowing if a doctor has connected himself somewhere else (To be considered in discrepancies). Opportunity: If people connected correctly we don't miss them.	To add connection No action before login Login into GMC connect the default page is under notice doctors' list Select Add doctor on the LHS put the doctor GMC number to search doctor Select reason for adding connection Submit To Remove connection No action before login Login into GMC connect the default page is under notice doctors' list Select All doctor on the LHS Click remove doctor towards the end of the individual doctor’s row Note: Good thing about using GMC is that some doctors are not on TIS but in GMC - GMC connect is used to add connection for such doctor. Pain Point: Only displaying All doctors and can only add or remove doctor's connection Only displaying All doctors and can only add or remove doctor's connection Can't view list of historic connection except by individual search Opportunity: Historic Connection Tab in new TIS Reval Bulk add/remove connection Able to hide doctor from list	Action: To be considered for discrepancies People connected to wrong RO/Trust <what do we send to the GMC. Could the doctor connect themselves to the wrong RO/Trust – Should doc be moved to discrepancy? GMC web service user guide? How does a LO resolve GMC send wrong> 25/08/2022 Not possible to be connected to the wrong RO if the DB is correct because RO are associated to DB. The only possibility is for doctors to connect to wrong DB or trust (as a DB). This scenario is already covered in the connection logic - Discrepancies Doctor not disconnecting themselves when they finish <the programme end should send doctor to discrepancy for action> Doctors not connecting themselves but If a doctor connect himself 2 weeks or more than the programme start date - they are disconnected by Admin <discrepancy> No way of knowing if a doctor has connected himself somewhere else ????? is there any other system doctors uses to do connection apart from GMC connect? <we don’t think so> < Users is there any circumstance where a trainee is not on TIS>?	No ticket/Action Required? This part is covered in the connection discrepancies
What Admin will be able to do in connection tabs	Current Connections: Just see doctors connected to the DB Historic Connections: Not adding any Value Discrepancies: Add/Remove connections Hidden: Can't think of anything why we need it	Current Connections: See list and Disconnect Historic Connections: Just view Discrepancies: Connect disconnect, Hide and add Note- Reason for Hidden? Hidden: Unhide and add Note- Reason for Hidden	Action: Redesign of update connection (MVP) and bulk connection (Post MVP?) Priority: Current connection and Discrepancies tabs (MVP?). Hidden and Historic Post MVP? <Incline towards TV/NW – features already developed> Previous tickets completed looked into what data comes from GMC and what comes from TIS, and how that combined data then populates Current Connections and Discrepancies. Then to understand where Reval admins manually effect changes to this base data coming in. Could really use a diagram here! Easier to enable functionality across the board than to limit on one place or another.	Need to create ticket
UI Design - Doctor detail page	Programme History: No value added Connection History : Yes want to see Update Connection : Yes want to see	Programme History: No value added Connection History : Yes want to see Update Connection : Yes want to see	Action: To remove the programme History from the new design	Need to create ticket

Summary Page fields- Current Connection

...

End date
Current connection Fields
Is this field Required?
Y/N: London Response
If yes, why is the field Required? London Response
Is this field Required?
Y/N: TV & NW Response
If yes, why is the field Required? TV & NW Response
Comment/concerns/query: London Response
Comment/concerns/query: TV & NW Response
Ticket
First name
Y
To identify trainee
Y

No ticket/Action Required?
Last name
Y
To identify trainee
Y

No ticket/Action Required?
GMC No
Y
To identify trainee
Y

No ticket/Action Required?
Programme
Y
To identify where they are placed
Y
Should this be renamed ‘Current Programme’?
Should this be renamed ‘Current Programme’?
that would be helpful
No ticket/Action Required?
GMC Submission date
Y
So they are revalidated in time
Y

No ticket/Action Required?
Designated body
Y
So you know which DB they fall under
Y
This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field in their summary page
This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field in their summary page thank you
No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Owner
N
Can’t see what it would be used for. However we would need PROGRAMME NAME to identify the specialty.
Y
Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB
Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs
Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB
Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs yes in some circumstances for example where a trainee has a conflict of interest with the RO this is very unusual in the NW but could be more common in other areas – this could also apply to national grid trainees in some areas
No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Membership
Y
Not one I use but guess useful given other categories other than substantive.
Y
This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT
This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT
If they are connected then they should be substantive – the military, visitor etc wouldn’t be connected to the DB so wouldn’t be needed on this list
No ticket/Action Required?
Current Connection

N
Don’t think this is required because the 'Current Connection' Tab is reflecting current connected doctors
Don’t think this is required because the 'Current Connection' Tab is reflecting current connected doctors
Start date

connected doctors correct they would all be connected as on the list
Need to create ticket to remove column
Start date
N
Is this start date in post. Not sure it is needed as if not yet started but they do connect would be picked up in discrepancies.
?

I think that if anything date first connected would be useful rather than their start date in TIS but is not necessary
Need to create ticket to remove column
End date

Again not sure it’s used but no problem if others use it.
N

Need to create ticket to remove column

Summary Page fields- Historic Connection

...

Current connection Fields
Is this field Required?
Y/N: London Response
If yes, why is the field Required? London Response
Is this field Required?
Y/N: TV & NW Response
If yes, why is the field Required? TV & NW Response
Comment/concerns/query: London Response
Comment/concerns/query: TV & NW Response
Ticket
First name
Y

Y

No ticket/Action Required?
Last name
Y

Y

No ticket/Action Required?
GMC No
Y

Y

No ticket/Action Required?
Programme

The last one only?
Y
What should be displayed here?
Should it be the latest past programme connection with the DB only or multiple programme list with other DBs?
What should be displayed here?
Should it be the latest past programme connection with the DB only or multiple programme list with other DBs?If possible it would be ideal to see a full history but as this is in TIS then the latest past programme would suffice
No ticket/Action Required?
GMC Submission date
Y
So can see when put through?
N
Should this be empty? If yes, why the need to display?
Should this be empty? If yes, why the need to display? This wouldn’t be needed as would be inaccurate as there would be no way to be updated via TIS API if not connected
No ticket/Action Required?
Designated body
Y
See which RP they fell under?
N
This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field
Should this be empty? If yes, why the need to display?
This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field
Should this be empty? If yes, why the need to display?I wouldn’t think be needed
No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Owner

Y
Should it be the latest past Programme Owner?
Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB
Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs
Should it be the latest past Programme Owner?I think so
Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB
Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs
No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Membership

Y
This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT
This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT
No ticket/Action Required?
Current Connection

N
Don’t think this is required because the 'Historic Connection' Tab is reflecting disconnected doctors
Don’t think this is required because the 'Historic Connection' Tab is reflecting disconnected doctors Not required as be inaccurate as not available via TIS API as not longer connected
Need to create ticket to remove column
Start date

Y

Start date of connection with DB
No ticket/Action Required?
End date

Y

End date of connection with DB
No ticket/Action Required?

Versions Compared

Old Version 3

New Version Current

Key

Summary Page fields- Current Connection

Summary Page fields- Historic Connection

Current connection Fields	Is this field Required? Y/N: London Response	If yes, why is the field Required? London Response	Is this field Required? Y/N: TV & NW Response	Comment/concerns/query: London Response	Comment/concerns/query: TV & NW Response	Ticket
First name	Y	To identify trainee	Y			No ticket/Action Required?
Last name	Y	To identify trainee	Y			No ticket/Action Required?
GMC No	Y	To identify trainee	Y			No ticket/Action Required?
Programme	Y	To identify where they are placed	Y	Should this be renamed ‘Current Programme’?	Should this be renamed ‘Current Programme’? that would be helpful	No ticket/Action Required?
GMC Submission date	Y	So they are revalidated in time	Y			No ticket/Action Required?
Designated body	Y	So you know which DB they fall under	Y	This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field in their summary page	This field only appears for London but other DBs will not see the field in their summary page thank you	No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Owner	N	Can’t see what it would be used for. However we would need PROGRAMME NAME to identify the specialty.	Y	Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs	Is it possible for the programme owner to be different from the DB? If no, is the field required because the doctor is currently connected to the DB Note: It might be required for London because of the 4 DBs yes in some circumstances for example where a trainee has a conflict of interest with the RO this is very unusual in the NW but could be more common in other areas – this could also apply to national grid trainees in some areas	No ticket/Action Required?
Programme Membership	Y	Not one I use but guess useful given other categories other than substantive.	Y	This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT	This is mostly Substantive. Other categories are Military, Visitor or LAT If they are connected then they should be substantive – the military, visitor etc wouldn’t be connected to the DB so wouldn’t be needed on this list	No ticket/Action Required?
Current Connection			N	Don’t think this is required because the 'Current Connection' Tab is reflecting current connected doctors	Don’t think this is required because the 'Current Connection' Tab is reflecting current connected doctors	Start date	connected doctors correct they would all be connected as on the list	Need to create ticket to remove column
Start date	N	Is this start date in post. Not sure it is needed as if not yet started but they do connect would be picked up in discrepancies.	?		I think that if anything date first connected would be useful rather than their start date in TIS but is not necessary	Need to create ticket to remove column
End date		Again not sure it’s used but no problem if others use it.	N			Need to create ticket to remove column