Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Workshop feedback to be used in handover for Matt notice period on 25/10/19

NETS Reporting tool workshop feedback


Wants/NeedsConcernsQuick Wins
Slide 1
  • UI Page instead to access further data
  • Intro dashboard could adapt the page which explains all the other dashboards to create an overall introduction
  • Log in dictates if you see Internal or External tool
  • What happens when response rates increase and released nationally
  • What happens when the survey has done two revolutions
  • Do we need it at all
  • Link is broken so email better
  • Add in which survey the tool links to (date)
  • HEE Branding to be better
  • Contents page would be useful
  • Purpose of the survey upfront
  • Navigation to each area with a short description
  • Last updated - Data as title
  • Contact information
Slide 2
  • Need an indication of response rates to show the validity
  • Add a theme/indicator level under the domain
  • Responders by Region - may be more useful to have response numbers vs total learners (ie. Total potential responses)
  • Future - To cover all domains in questions
  • Respond by Region. Change to number + Split Med and Non-Med
  • Useful only to operational staff


  • Do filters filter all pages or just single page
  • How will this be presented year on year
  • Not measuring against all the domains
  • Number of questions varies by domain (2-15) How best to summarise
  • Not useful EXTERNALLY (Just more information to navigate past)
  • What are our response rates? What do about non-med?
  • If we get Slide 1 right we don't need this

Summary slides
  • Overall satisfaction by location (Drill down on a map)
  • Rag ratings
  • Positivity/negativity
  • OS by Region/Trust/Programme - Drill down to see questions
  • Can we RAG
  • Domain useful internally at National/board level
  • Question categories: eg Teaching, Supervision useful externally and Local Office level
  • Would like the option to compare responses to regional mean as well as national (overall sat. by location chart)
  • Ability to be able to compare results for sites as well as trusts
  • Create a common NETS language (like GMC flags - or NETS flags)
  • Click on a result by domain to see questions items that feed into it
  • Domain level too broad 'overall Sat need to drill down to 'Supervision', 'Training' etc
  • Breakdown of response has 'value' for local offices
  • Can we map risk against the HEE risk matrix?
  • OV Sat/OV Variance tabs would be useful if displayed by Category/Teacher/Supervision
  • Results on a page. eg - for a provider - too many tabs to view all data
  • If we theme the questions by Supervision etc, it may be easier to understand/more useful
  • OV Variance filter by colour coding to investigate potential risk
  • Can we RAG/Categorise data in some way as GMC? (We all understand that system & so do trusts)
  • Currently can't answer business questions from too!
  • How do we identify the key areas of risk in these pages
  • Ask National Directors how they want to analyze business risk
  • How do we know which are our organizations of greatest risk? Need to agree threshold + process
  • Calculation of data/scores/risk. How do we want to count? Data methodology

Slide 12


Slide 13


  • No labels