09 October 2017
# | Feedback | Comment | Story? | Reporter | Outcome | Owner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Complete | ||||
2 |
| Programme now appears on Prod (JW 17.10.17) Trainee and Primary Specialty missing (14/1/18) | Joanne Watson | Task up | ||
| Complete | |||||
| ||||||
5 |
| Ify OO | ||||
6 |
| tasked up | - TISDEV-2837Getting issue details... STATUS | Ify OO | ||
7 | Russell Steel (Unlicensed), Alex Dobre (Unlicensed) There were discussions about Posts having a main site and other sites associated to them, the 'Site' column therefore was not populated in TIS as unsure which site this should show, although the most obvious would be the Main site to display in this column. There were difficulties mentioned by dev to have this column sortable. Do you require any further input from BA/PO to make this column work? | In progress, will be shown at Sprint 34 Review (RN Title on Post list needs to be Main Site not Primary Site to match the field title in a Post record. | Ify OO | To be tasked up | ||
|
| Complete | ||||
9 |
| Correct on Prod (JW 17.10.17) | Ify OO | |||
| Complete | |||||
11 | When creating a post the smart search does not work in the Approved Grade and Other Grades fields | The grade list seems to show all the grades from all local offices - has this reference table been aligned? JW Show only the current grades in the reference table drop down | create a task (IO) | Joanne Watson | ||
| Complete | |||||
13 | Training Body and Employing Body are not mandatory | Task up | Joanne Watson | |||
Complete | ||||||
|
| Complete | ||||
|
| Complete | ||||
|
| Complete | ||||
| Complete | |||||
19 | the exact structure of the bucket posts vary from region to region, but an example for East Midlands would be EMD/OOP/CMT/S - where EMD is our local office code, OOP to identify it's a bucket post, CMT is the specialty and S is our south rotation In NW we would use /S to signify a Supernumerary post and I think that this was agreed in a HEDG meeting. All our OOP bucket posts are now NWE/OOPx ( x = post type, C / E / P / R ) as, again, I thought that was what was agreed at HEDG. I don't think you should have different posts for OOPR/OOPC etc., as that should be detailed in Placement Type. You are right about /S being supernumerary though. Our OOP posts use the GMC programme codes, and we have one per programme e.g. WMD/682/OOP would be the CMT OOP post, WMD/682/DEFERRAL would be the CMT deferral post Find it useful for doing the recruitment numbers if I can see all the current OOP placements for a programme just by going into the relevant post | No agreement about how to manage record OOP posts has yet been reached. Paper has been written but full agreement with data leads in LOs is not in place yet (JW 9.11.17) (IO) What's the timeline for understanding this? To clarify with SMLs 10/01 | TBC | Gwilym WIlliams, Dale Gilbert and Tom de Salis | Confirmation still needed from SMLs re agreement | |
Complete | ||||||
21 | Should legacy programmes also be flagged as current? i.e. usable in creating/editing records | (JW) no, this should be corrected, how tbc by data leads | Ify OO | Confirmation needed from data leads about how to correct this. | ||
22 | We've just had our placements SML meeting and a point was raised regarding clinical supervisors which I didn't want to be lost between the 2 groups. Would it be a good idea to have it optional to select a clinical supervisor against a post so that it can auto-populate in placements? The reason being that for many specialties/sites the supervisor will always be the same for a specific post, and so it would reduce input time for placements if it could pre-populate. It would still need to be editable in placements for when this isn't the case, or if the supervisor is different for whatever reason | Open to Post SMLs for comment (IO) Current specification means that multiple supervisors can be added to a post, then when creating/editing the Placement, a drop-down is produced. If users want to add a supervisor who is not in the drop down, the admin would have to edit the post. | Gwilym Williams | |||
23 | Applicable validation rules to be added as discussed as part of People (People - Field Validation | Activating Save & Errors) | Covered in feedback from SMLS - TIS team need to agree save actions Will only be able to test this when the Save function on Posts works | create a task to cover wider save actions (IO) | Ify OO | Save function on Posts needs to work in order to review this | |
|
| Complete | ||||
Only show to the user those programmes in their local office | ||||||
26 | Can I start a new thread about joint site posts. These are very common in Orthodontics but can occur in other specialties too? There is no way to properly represent these in Intrepid. We need to do better in TIS. The basic situation is that there is the need to allow for training placements that spend a portion of the time at one site and the rest of the time at another site. This may be 50/50 but can be as skewed as 80/20 or exceptionally even 90/10. There is not much of an issue if the two Sites are at the same trust, as we just make it a multi-site post and all the funding goes to the one Trust. But the problem occurs when the two sites are in different Trusts. We currently create two NPNs, one for each Trust. We can specify with Funding Components how much funding goes to each. But we cannot formally link the two posts so that a placement in one is seen as intimately involved with a placement in the other. I had thought it would be good to create a single post with multiple sites and multiple funding components, but it doesn't work because how do you specify multiple Funding Bodies? The Funding Body is used to determine which Trust's LDA payment the funding is part of and if we send Trusts lists of posts the post would need to be in the lists for both Trusts. So I'm now thinking keeping two posts but adding a formal linking mechanism is the best solution. Comments please! | Open to Post SMLs for comment (IO) Options to be discussed:
Not MVP - therefore post TCS work | Post TCS as not MVP | Dave Raynor | Not MVP | |
27 | Local Office of posts is (in some cases) not the correct local office | Think this is a Post to local office link issue - JW to investigate more (JW) to review bug as is clearly apparant for NE/YH posts | Joanne Watson | JW to investigate with local offices | ||
28 | Placement info within the trainee record. Please could you include the WTE? That way we can see at a glance if a post has a slot share (or potential for a slot share). This would also be useful in the person>placement list so that we don't have to go into each placement to see if someone was working LTFT and which % they were at. | For discussion with devs (IO) Display "Slot Share Allowed?" toggle? Also possible to display WTE in placement, however People list page has several columns - either need to have Placements list, or remove another column? (JW) People SMLs to review the People list and advise on columns needed (JW) Clarify what "Potential for Slot Share" means - can all posts not have the potential to be available for slot share? question for Post SMLs Potentially just for reporting. (JW) Display WTE in Post List - does this add value ? | Gwilym Williams | Further action needed by SMLs - see questions | ||
29 | Post funding update: My proposal would very crudely explained be the following: Funding Type: ‘Other’ – Other Type (standardised list to be decided) – Free text box for additional info Public Health salary recharges
| (IO) Are the 2 sets of points un-related? i.e. funding type "other" allows free text and then points 1-8 are other drop down options? (JW) post MVP. No functional equivalence | James Harris
| Not MVP | ||
30 | Live review: removing filters is very slow | (IO) NFR - needs to be tackled across the site | Ify O, 06/12 | |||
31 | Live review: no sites, specialties or grades displayed in form | (IO) bug - TBC by devs, ETLs have not been running. Fix applied now Sites and Specialties still not showing -grades showing inaccurately | Ify O, 06/12 | Ticket needed | ||
32 | Live review: no employing bodies displayed | Ify O, 06/12 | ||||
33 | Live review: it might be useful to have a screen prompt so the user knows they’re creating a post (as opposed to editing one) | (IO) Nice to have rather than MVP | Ify O, 06/12 | Not MVP | ||
34 | Live review: inactive status on create still available - what happened to the story? | (IO) bug - TBC by devs | Ify O, 06/12 | |||
35 | Just been playing around and found an issue with the filtering by local office. Not sure if this is known... When I logged in I had the filters on posts including "Health Education England North Central and East London" but when I searched for a post which had this as a local office it wasnt showing. I removed all the filters and I can then see the post. The post I was trying to find is LDN/RAL26/DC2/DC2/001. | (JW) bug TBC by Devs - cannot see exact filter (CLH to clarify filter name), but none of "Health Education England North Central London" posts can be found. | Claire Le Houx | |||
| ||||||
37 | (JW) data leads to confirm how this is progressed - most likely for post TCS as not MVP | James Harris 21/12/17 | Not MVP | |||
38 | (JW) yes, ticket to be created (IO) Alphabetical order according to which field/column? The columns are sortable, does this resolve? (JW) suggest adding Programme Number to Post record as prog numbers are defined by the training local office. But also ensure that users only see the Programmes that belong to their local office (IO) none is because it's a mandatory field, so something must be entered. Remove Funding Type as a mandatory field. JW to create story to confirm which fields in a post record are mandatory (IO) Funding body is legacy in V10 however there can be more than one funding org in the funding components part of V10 - what do the SMLs want us to do with this info - do we select the non local office org? WM, LaSE and EoE to agree. | Claire Le Houx 27/12/17 | ||||
39 | (IO) amend mandatory rule for funding end date - NEW STORY (not mandatory field) | Claire Le Houx 27/12/17 | ||||
40 | (IO) was BUG: duplicate posts - fixed now on NE list - please confirm if OK CLH
| Claire Le Houx 28/12/17 | Claire to confirm if the duplicate posts have been removed. | |||
41 | (IO) sounds like ETL issues
Raise ticket to get placement headings included in list Can we also include WTE of the holders of the post? Fix backend info being surfaced - remove Post ID from post list Ticket raised for navigation issues (Dave clicked on a Placement in a Post record which took him to the placements relating to one trainee. Clicking 'Back' took him to the Person list. Ticket to investigate missing placements | Dave Rayner 4/1/18 | ||||
42 | (JW) Maybe needs a info button to describe - future proofing the system | Amanda Barber 8/1/18 | ||||
43 | (IO) clarification required, all Post numbers are to be autogenerated - however autogen not currently working (JW) Create a ticket to fix post number autogen not working issue | Amanda Barber 8/1/18 | ||||
44 | Navigate to Post - I can navigate to the Posts section. Successfully navigated to post | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | ||||
45 | View Post List - I can sort Posts by Post Number and filter on multiple columns. I can navigate between pages. But I have on occasions ended up with a Filter applied that is not show in the filter list (header). Could view the post list Posts can only be sorted based on fields NPN, and Current trainee. Can they be sorted on other values? | (IO) Mike - can we have an example of this please? Given the choice between filter and sort which is most needed for MVP? | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | SMLs to confirm which columns they want to have as Sort and which as Filter | ||
46 | I can search Posts using part of the Post Number but I can’t search using the full Post Number (I have to truncate it). I can search against Programme Name. Successfully searched for a specific post It seems that the post search is working mostly on Programme name field but is not searching for the text within other fields, most importantly National post number. It is unclear how I would search for posts when missing part of the national post number. On Intrepid I would use wildcard for the part that is unknown. For example all posts with NPNs starting LDN and containing SHO cannot be filtered. Typing SHO in the Grade filter and hiting enter should select all available values rather than forcing the user to select as it is possible that they don't know the specific value Search of guy's in Primary site filter is not bring up the site <RJ121 Guy'S Hospital> users will not know the ODs code that is preciding most sites this limits filtering fucntionality significantly, especially considering that so many site names have been changed to what is on Intrepid Search terms in example match text in site names, Programme Names (e.g. General Practice - Guys & St. Thomas' LDN) and Trusts (not sure if what is not on summary is searchable) - terms <guy's and St. thoma> and <guy's & St> are returning nothing when should be matching several fields. <guy's hospital> term is bringing up no posts when there are more than 750 posts with main site of <Guy's Hospital> or in TIS <RJ121 Guy'S Hospital>. Searching with wildcard of % did not change this - is there a wildcard? If you have a post number, it does pull it through when entered in the search facility, but you cannot clear the search with out closing the window and loggin back in I can type into the programme right to search for a specific specialty, it does not pull the information through and gives the error message 'We could not find any results. Please clear your search critieria or try to remove some filters in order to reset results.' | (IO) example please Mike - full post number search works now. as above Can raise as requirement but would require more info. Can currently search for posts beginning with LDN and then filter on approved grade of SHO - does this help? Wildcard search needed There are may different values for SHO - which one would be correct? We are currently taking the site and trust info from the ODS list and has been the case since TIS was first started. Need to take Trust and Site reference values from current reference tables in Intrepid Demo to devs Need more info here please as I cannot find any posts either Clear all search criteria in the search box and press enter. More info needed here please | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
47 | I can View/Edit a post and add Funding Elements but when I try to Save it says Site ID cannot be null or negative, Grade ID cannot be negative (twice).
Save option didn’t work therefore no changes could be saved. Specialty dropdown is coming up with invalid post specialty options and isn’t limited to national table. Post Grade dropdown is coming up with invalid post grade options and isn’t limited to approved national table Main site field search is behaving strangly: results for text <guy's> is not bringing up results such as <RJ101 - Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Trust'> a value that is coming up for search term <guy'> subspecialty list is not limited to subspecialties of the main specialty
Unable to delete post - getting Site and grade error messages - same as on screenshot 3. You can't highlight over a post number in the post list, to copy it, it automatically takes you into that posts details. You then can't return back to the page you was on (for eg. If you'd had filter post from a specific Trust) it takes you back the the person page again.
| (JW) bug - to be raised with devs
Agree...ticket to be raised. Will investigate and raise ticket - reference tables not being correct - limit reference tables to current values only Will investigate and define clearly to SMLs (and all users) what the search function searches on - links to point 46 Will investigate (what is being shown?) and raise ticket if needed
Need to agree how to deal with deletion. Ticket up
| Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
48 |
|
| Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
|
| |||||
50 | Delete Post Funding - I don’t know what this means. Not populated Unable to edit post so cannot test | (IO) Template confusion - cannot yet delete post funding. Story needs to be developed for managing changes to funding. Will need input from SMLs | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
51 | Create New Post (Bulk) - I don’t know where to do this. Unclear how to do this Unable to test | (IO) not yet developed story | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
| ||||||
|
| |||||
54 | Unlink programme - I can’t see where to remove a Programme from a Post or visa versa. No programme detail available. Unable to edit post so cannot test | (JW) Post ownership. Have story to record/report on historical programme to post relationships Above feedback shows what we look at in training colleagues on TIS | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
55 | Create funding, not associated with a post - I don’t know what this means. Attempted to create a new funding type under Admin but this would not save. Unable to edit post so cannot test | (IO) needs to be developed in TIS post March 2018 | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
56 | Add leave approver I don’t know where to do this. Unclear how to do this. Unable to test | (IO) not yet developed story Related to approvals chains | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
57 | Reporting on vacancies and fill rates I don’t know where to do this. Unclear how to do this. Unable to test | (IO) not yet developed story - PART OF REPORTING COMPONENT Vacancy Matrix being looked at by EoE and vacancy and fill rates are national requirements so form part of the NDW work | Mike Richardson, Kay Appleyard, Claire Le Houx | |||
58 | Post number is not created when a new post is created - need to list as a bug - JW 10/1/18 | |||||
59 | SMLs need to agree what to show in funding body field | |||||
Add Comment