1This page summarises Teams feedback and helps manage how this is being taken forward.
No | Sequential number for ref |
When | When first raised on Teams for easy cross reference |
Who | Who raised feedback |
What | Very brief summary |
Answer | Very brief summary |
Action | What we are doing about it? Is is with UR, ticked up etc. |
UR LINKS | UR Capture User Notes, User Engagement Capture etc. UR White Board Link-https://app.mural.co/t/work15437/m/work15437/1674426974952/dd8932121d7bc0a5b4b3b731167a12465393a812?sender=ud435db1abb4efdddc00a4084 |
When | Who | What | Answer | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 June 16:07 | Pepe | Obligation to maintain right connections | Rob to add to UR page the legal and policy drivers for Connections | Rob updated UR page - User session on Connections 12/08/22 |
| 2 | 8 June 17:56 | Katy (NW) | Drop Bilklis and Nichola from the Private Beta | Acknowledged | Rob updated the Leads spreadsheet User groups and Leads.xlsx |
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | 12 June 10:02 | Katy (NW) | Using DB codes is confusing | Acknowledged and picked up by UR | TIS21-4655 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
| 5 | 12 June 09:14 | Katy (NW) | Hide e.g. Associate Deans - connected but hidden and adding and removing (presumably from hidden) | Acknowledged and picked up by UR | Open |
| 6 | 12 June 09:16 | Katy (NW) | Send to GMC comes up as “Save”, but should be “Submit” so it’s clear what's happening? | Acknowledged and picked up by UR | Make a ticket |
| 7 | 12 June 09:16 | Katy (NW) | Filtering and sorting | Acknowledged and picked up by UR Filtering by programme name and now just a case to confirm other filtering and sorting needs. Already have some feedback requirements which are obvious and offer continuity from V1. |
TIS21-4635
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
|
| 8 | 12 June 09:16 | Katy (NW) | F1 doctors - remove as not part of revalidation - auto hidden | Acknowledged and picked up by UR Prioritise this so we can move forward. Noting architectural decsion. | TIS21-4154 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
| 9 | 12 June 08:45 | Katy (NW) | Dummy record removal | All have the role of 'placeholder'. Some legitimate doctors will have role as NULL. Normally use | TIS21-4690 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | 13 June 10:16 | Katy (NW) | “Flag” to show worked on a record. | Has this come up in UR? | Need to fully understand and define user story |
| 12 | 13 June 10:24 | Katy (NW) | How records in discrepancy are pulled through - placement or programme | Cai → So discrepancies currently come through where there is any mismatch between the DBC of the current programme on TIS and the DBC reported by GMC, if that helps? Note - Every trainee should be in a placement, even within the “period of grace” (PoG). We use the Programme End Date rather than latest Curriculum End Date (rather than CCT) (query) | What is current? |
| 13 | 13 June 10:42 | Katy (NW) | Screenshot of repeated trainee Bokhari (7399152) + couple of other duplicates | Has been investigated - data issue rather than a bug. | TIS21-4662 - Getting issue details... STATUS + Data Issue |
| 14 | 13 June 11:40 | Katy (NW) | Why trainees appearing on list **** | Is linked to #13 | |
| 15 | 13 June 11:15 | Katy (NW) | 2 programmes listed when not dual trainee | When multiple programme son TIS we don’t send back the DB. When two progs in same DB then show in discrepancy list.
| Further investigate Discussion session |
| 16 | 13 June 11:13 | Kate (NW | |||
| 17 | 15 June 10:00 | Katy(NW) | DB Still appears as HENW-Old Abbreviation. | Acknowledged by Rob Could be handled in the FE. Linked to #4 | Highlighted as Insight from UR Session. |
| 18 | 15 June 10:13 | Katy(NW) | Positive Feedback-much quicker to add and disconnect via TIS than direct on GMC connect which is a positive | Acknowledged and picked up by UR | Positive Feedback |
| 19 | 15 June 13:29 | Stuart(LON/KSS) | User Experience- For screen to go back to Connections home screen once Dismiss is selected after the Success confirmation. | Acknowledged and picked up by UR | Make a ticket |
| 20 | 23 June 15:22 | Katy(NW) | Any update on bugs? So we don't have duplicate records, those without placements etc in the list as it is really hard to manage and remember the ones which are due to a bug, those who are foundation/TPD and those who are on to be processed. | picked up by UR. | Team to give an update on this to the Reval Admin. |
| 21 | 23 June 18:11 | Katy(NW) | "add" and "remove" split for the discrepancies- is this being looked at in the MVP? | Picked up by UR- this was picked up in usability testing. | Team to give an update on this to the Reval Admin. |
| 22 | 23 June 15:22 | Stuart(LON/KSS) | Bulk select option doesn't seem to be working on the connections module - the columns don't shift over to allow the tick boxes to be selected. | Picked up by Steve-Seems okay- requested for a screenshot. Reply from other user-this function looks OK but due to the filtering it wouldn't be useful for us to use. Filtering requirement requested- This has been picked up as an insight in UR. Users requesting for filtering - replicate People Section of TIS filtering. | Team to discuss |
| 23 | 29 June 09:50 | Katy(NW) | How long does the list take to refresh - I updated 7562555 on 27 June but is it still in the discrepancy list? | Acknowledge and picked up by UR | Team currently working on resolving this issue. |
Add Comment