You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 4
Next »
Workshop feedback to be used in handover for Matt notice period on 25/10/19
| Wants/Needs | Concerns | Quick Wins |
|---|
| Slide 1 | - UI Page instead to access further data
- Intro dashboard could adapt the page which explains all the other dashboards to create an overall introduction
- Log in dictates if you see Internal or External tool
| - What happens when response rates increase and released nationally
- What happens when the survey has done two revolutions
- Do we need it at all
- Link is broken so email better
- Add in which survey the tool links to (date)
| - HEE Branding to be better
- Contents page would be useful
- Purpose of the survey upfront
- Navigation to each area with a short description
- Last updated - Data as title
- Contact information
|
| Slide 2 | - Need an indication of response rates to show the validity
- Add a theme/indicator level under the domain
- Responders by Region - may be more useful to have response numbers vs total learners (ie. Total potential responses)
- Future - To cover all domains in questions
- Respond by Region. Change to number + Split Med and Non-Med
- Useful only to operational staff
| - Do filters filter all pages or just single page
- How will this be presented year on year
- Not measuring against all the domains
- Number of questions varies by domain (2-15) How best to summarise
- Not useful EXTERNALLY (Just more information to navigate past)
- What are our response rates? What do about non-med?
- If we get Slide 1 right we don't need this
|
|
| Summary slides | - Overall satisfaction by location (Drill down on a map)
- Rag ratings
- Positivity/negativity
- OS by Region/Trust/Programme - Drill down to see questions
- Can we RAG
- Domain useful internally at National/board level
- Question categories: eg Teaching, Supervision useful externally and Local Office level
- Would like the option to compare responses to regional mean as well as national (overall sat. by location chart)
- Ability to be able to compare results for sites as well as trusts
- Create a common NETS language (like GMC flags - or NETS flags)
- Click on a result by domain to see questions items that feed into it
- Domain level too broad 'overall Sat need to drill down to 'Supervision', 'Training' etc
- Breakdown of response has 'value' for local offices
- Can we map risk against the HEE risk matrix?
- OV Sat/OV Variance tabs would be useful if displayed by Category/Teacher/Supervision
- Results on a page. eg - for a provider - too many tabs to view all data
- If we theme the questions by Supervision etc, it may be easier to understand/more useful
- OV Variance filter by colour coding to investigate potential risk
| - Can we RAG/Categorise data in some way as GMC? (We all understand that system & so do trusts)
- Currently can't answer business questions from too!
- How do we identify the key areas of risk in these pages
- Ask National Directors how they want to analyze business risk
- How do we know which are our organizations of greatest risk? Need to agree threshold + process
- Calculation of data/scores/risk. How do we want to count? Data methodology
|
|
| Slide 12 |
|
|
|
| Slide 13 |
|
|
|
0 Comments