Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

#
Discussion/Action
Responsible
Outcome
Status
1

Reports requested by each region have been submitted to JT, Alice and James for writing up in SQL.

JT, AB and JH had a meeting on the 8/12 to identify themes in the reporting requirements to allow a suite of reports to be written but with filterable criteria to allow each local office/region to run the reports they need,

JW

AB and JH - to write the reports

JW provided the initial list of reports for creation

JH/AB: Pushed into Tableau as data sources. Completed 1 of the reports.

JT to publish for users to test.

Logins to be setup for users.

To present what's done so far (Tuesday 16/01) with Reporting SMLs.

JW/JT to coordinate the access to Tableau  for the SMLs to test the reports.  - In Progress with JT

List of names sent to JW

Quick guide to send to SMLs


2

Oriel Integration:


AR

Tasks created and summarised in the table here. 

Create an Oriel Integration Channel on Teams  - Done

To schedule a quick presentation of the Oriel trainees import process. - People SMLs, a message on General 


3
  • Programme names/numbers aren’t provided for Dental trainees, they’re created by Admins
JH, AP, IO


Proposed Solution (JH)

  • 3 letter use the prefix of the local office + 3 digit acronym based on specialty
  • 3 digit specialty acronym should be consistent across all


Action: AP/IO to impact assess

JH: Done mapping and need to do some more work and send to AP.

AP has received James ssheet.

More generally, we should look to standardise naming conventions around programmes (not just Dental) to be discussed separately

Next to put on Microsoft Teams and get SMLs feedback - AP

JH/AP - Setup call to briefly explain next week.

IO/AP: Recommendation: show a concatenated display of the programme name in the dropdown list with the Local Office name? To check with DEV on the possible solutions. (P1)  TISDEV-3767 - Getting issue details... STATUS


4

ESR Integration Data Quality tasks. Some of the fields are mandatory for ESR to create records. 

  • TISDEV-3322 - Missing mandatory Person details: First Name, surname and DOB TO DO
  • TISDEV-3330 - Investigate and fix trainee records missing email address. TO DO
  • TISDEV-3324 - Fix data for missing address details TO DO
IO: 
  • Discuss with Reubs on the next course of action.
  • All tickets clarified, require the report to be looked at again to confirm there are still issues pending

3322:

DS: Duplicate issues to be fixed to reduce the numbers of missing details.

CL/IO: To identify which of those are current trainees records; who is in a current/future programme/placement?

AB: Which of those have self-service access?


IO to confirm - check whether there is a trainee is in a current or future programme membership or placement and re-do reports, update data leads



5

Fields comparison/review between TIS and Intrepid. Fields removed from Intrepid when coming across to TIS

JW/AP/CL to review Next Monday (15/01).

JW/AP/CL

Separate spreadsheet reviewed - to be attached

DR2 to TIS Field Mapping. with Actions_IO update.xlsx (now added to the able, see below items 10-32)

AP/CL to provide an update.


CLOSED
6

ESR Integration - Data Quality

  • TISDEV-3620 - Investigate the proportion of Dental trainees with/without GDC dates TO DO - Investigate the proportion of Dental trainees with/without GDC date - JH
  • TISDEV-3663 - GDC Number of N/A - Investigate TO DO  - GDC Number of N/A - Investigate - AB
JH/AB

TISDEV - 3620 - Done

JH:

Assumption: Dental trainees to be any person record that has a GDC number which is not Null, N/A or blank

Total Number of Person Records: 13376
Number with a Start and Expiry Date: 622
Number with a Null Start or Expiry Date: 12754

% with valid dates: 4.65%
% without valid dates: 95.35%

TISDEV - 3363 - In Progress

JH/AB/CL/DS -

To get rid of the N/A for records that have a valid other registration number. We can only remove it for all if we are definitely not going to have person records which would not have an applicable reference number

I think the validation rule should stay the same

But what are we going to do with the practice manager records?

AR: To find out with ESR how they handle a GMC/GDC number of 'N/A'

Next Steps:

CL/JH: To be written down of what each means and share with SMLs?

AB: PH numbers - what is the standard format? Not consistent across LOs.

JH: 2 PH schools for assigning the numbers, also not mandatory to have one - make this a non-mandatory field?


7

Absence 

  •   TISDEV-3529 - Absence - Review proposed Study Leave template for TIS bulk import TO DO - Absence - Review proposed Study Leave template for TIS bulk import
CLAR/CL: To discuss and feed into the design work for Absence.
8

Reference Data - Status of the values

Intrepid Current reference values/tables - Can possibly be on DR2?

IO

Confirm with Paul what approach is being taken to update these - needs to be editable


yes there is support on the BE but its not currently there in the FE
[12:30 PM]
will need to give Panos some support when it gets deploy
[12:31 PM]
in the time being, we can do manual updates to statuses via the migration scripts

CLOSED

JH - Report on Audit trails in the Datawarehouse. To start with Placements. 

What are the Criteria? 

JW

JW to confirm, is it possible to report on audit information via data warehouse? 


Placements

  • amended date
  • field level change detail where the placement ID remains the same i.e. grade, start date, end date, specialty etc


02-Feb: it cannot currently be done, Audit is in elastic search and not directed at NDW (RN), and not being considered for MVP


10Role in Person- This is a comma separated field in the DR. Will this be a comma separated field pushed to the warehouse from TIS too?APAsk John ThompsonOPEN
11SecurityEmail in Person- This is missing from TIS. Will the email used for self-service / security be the normal EmailAddress?IO

Consolidation issue fixed, so need to pull report again and confirm, there are some trainees who use different self service address v email address on their profile

Security email address should be the primary email address for a trainee profile - they may have multiple addresses, so TIS needs to allow multiples -  TISDEV-3809 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
12Associated Site, Associated Trust, Associated Specialty in Person- Have these fields not been developed yet? They are used to manage Supervisors.IOTicketed and awaiting developmentCLOSED
13SiteID and GradeID in Placement- These fields are missing from the TIS placement table. Some posts are bucket posts so several different sites can be chosen for placements belonging to the same post so SiteID is needed against placements.. A specific placement grade is chosen from the other grade list in a post so the Grade ID is needed against placements.IOknown issue that we are working on.CLOSED
14Added Date and amended date for placements- Added date and amended date fields are needed for audit purposes.IOAudit data needs to be reportable - add as a NFROPEN
15Comments for Placements - A comments box is needed for placements.IO

Add story for comments box - add ticket

TISDEV-3810 - Getting issue details... STATUS

OPEN
16SupervisorType for PlacementSupervisor- A SupervisorType field is needed in the PlacementSupervisor table as supervisors can be added to placements as Clinical Supervisors or Educational Supervisors. Personally, I think it would be better to just have an Educational Supervisor field and a Clinical Supervisor field directly in the placements table in order to restrict the recording of only a single Educational Supervisor and a single Clinical Supervisor against each placement record. It also simplifies the database table structure.IONeed to display both clinical supervisor and educational supervisor within a placement, with lables for each - there may be multiple for each type? Tickets created

There is a need to simplify back end for supervisor allocation and reporting
CLOSED
17OtherGrades in Posts - I'm assuming OtherGrades are being stored in the PostGrade table?IOOther grades can be selected from the same list at the main; they all come from the same table - it's essentially a multiadd featureCLOSED
18Added Date and amended date for posts - Added date and amended date fields are needed for audit purposes.IO

These dates will be displayed within the record, also should be possible to extract it for reporting purpose from the data warehouse, but this is TBC (IO)

See example in #9

OPEN
19FundingBody in Post - Is this field being discontinued in TIS?IO

How are we mapping the funding information.


Funding Body & Funding Organisation should show in Posts against funding body - ticket created  TISDEV-3755 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
20Comments for Posts - A comments box is needed for posts.IO

NEW ticket - to be confirmed whether it is an should be possible to 

TISDEV-3811 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
21OtherSites for Posts - This is required in order to create "bucket" posts where several sites are against single posts so that specific site details can be chosen at placement level.IO

Current functionality to add multiple sites to a post; also need to confirm what the max upper limit is on adding sites (needs to be v high)


Review whether sites will allow whole site table to be associated with a post

  • no max in either back end or front end
CLOSED
22Comments for Programmes - A comments box is needed for programmesIO

NEW ticket required

TISDEV-3812 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
23CurriculumStartDate for ProgrammeMembership - Why in the TIS ProgrammeMembership table is there a CurriculumStartDate field? The minimum curriculum start date within the programme membership would always match the programme start date. The CurriculumCompletionDate field in ProgrammeMembership needs to match the maximum curriculum end date within the related programme membership as the ProgrammeCurriculumCompletionDate does in DR2.IO

Do we need currciulum start date as well as programme start date? They should always be the same date in most scenarios - TBC with SMLs


Display only curriculum start date as editable and Programme start date should be the same as the earliest curriculum start date + read only NEW TICKET 

TISDEV-3813 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
24Rotation in ProgrammeMembership - I don't understand what the rotation field is in the TIS ProgrammeMembership table.IOField to display the rotation a trainee has been added to, must be amended to multipleCLOSED
25AddedDate in ProgrammeMembership -  ProgrammeMembership already has an amended date field but it also needs an added date fieldIO

To be reviewed (IO) - new field required


TISDEV-3814 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
26ProgrammeNTN, ProgrammePost, Site, Trust, Administrator, Assessment, Course, CourseAttendance, CurriculumMembership, Entitlement, Grade, Leave, LeaveExpense, LocalOffice - Have these tables not been developed yet?IO

Need an updated schema to be shared with Data Leads


02-Feb:

CLOSED
27PostSpecialty, PlacementSpecialty, CurriculumSpecialty in Specialty - Are we no longer making a distinction between PostSpecialty, PlacementSpecialty, and CurriculumSpecialty? If so, why? Or are SpecialtyTypes related to this maybe?IOThere is still distinction between specialty types, not contained in data schema shared - to be updated and shared (see #26)CLOSED
28Grades in Curriculum - We need a grade list for each curriculum.IO

Check if grade can be added to curriculum in front end - NEW TICKET

TISDEV-3815 - Getting issue details... STATUS

CLOSED
29Slot Share in placements - Have this field been removed from TIS? 

Yes it has been removed - TBC is required, check Teams

No further comments on this

OPEN
30Honorary for placements - Have this field been removed from TIS? 

Yes it has been removed - TBC is required, check Teams

No further comments on this

OPEN
31ITP for placements - Have this field been removed from TIS? 

For the teams that are using this field, check where the secondary sites are in the back end; check Teams for further feedback on usage


To be discussed and agreed with all regions:

  • what should the standard usage process be?
  • how should it be recorded?
OPEN
32SLA placements - Have this field been removed from TIS? 

Yes it has been removed - TBC is required, check Teams

No further comments on this

OPEN
  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.