Page Contents:
- Active Working (images on the wall)
- Use Cases
- JIRA link
- For Discussion & Assumptions
- Agreed Next Steps
Active Working
Use Cases
JIRA Tickets
For Discussion
| # | Question | Comment | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEW: ability to see historical posts against a programme [related to PROGRAMMES COMPONENT] | ||
| 2 | Tariff Rate reference data - how to manage knock on effect when this is changed? | ||
| 3 | Rule: Post views are limited to local only, other than users who have cross-national oversight | ||
| 4 | TIS-12: Do we want to update to link / unlink posts and programmes? Update to align with correct format for whole | ||
| 5 | TIS-14: is the story wording accurate? | ||
| 6 | TIS-410: do we need a story about re-linking? | ||
| 7 | TIS-12: do we need a story about unlinking programme and post? | ||
| 8 | TIS-13: is this still required, Reuben to confirm? | ||
| 9 | TIS-325: is this a valid MVP requirement? How do you envision this being displayed? filter, flag? etc? | ||
| 10 | TIS-651: is this part of the create post journey? Should it be mandatory? where post is for GP? | ||
| 11 | TIS-381: is this a valid MVP requirement? How do you envision this being displayed? filter, flag? etc? | ||
| 12 | TIS-10: is the wording of the story accurate? | ||
| 13 | TIS-647: TBC how necessary this is for MVP (JW); how can this be achieved? (AD) | ||
| 14 | TIS-628: This has been made an MVP story, even though there isn’t equivalent functionality now; is wording accurate, can we get an example into the ticket, it’s a sub-requirement of create post | ||
| 15 | TIS-627: is this truly a an MVP requirement, is there any other way leave approver is defined (i.e. by person) and if so, do we need both? | ||
| 16 | TIS-671: link old and new posts (because a post has been disestablished) | ||
| 17 | TIS-672: ability to see historical programmes view against a post [POSTS] for discussion |
Agreed Next Steps
- Review Use Cases - JW / AP DONE
- Update Data Validation Table - JW / AP / IO DONE
- Update/add JIRA stories - IO DONE
- Refinement session (internal) - Russell, Alex, Steve, JW, AP, IO DONE
- Answer questions above - various
- Update Use Case scenarios - JW
- Validation session - JW / AP / SMLs
0 Comments