Page Contents:
...
- Description
- Active Working (images on the wall)Post Scenarios (Use Cases)
- Data Field Definition
- JIRA link
- For Discussion & Assumptions
- Agreed Next Steps
Active Working
Post Scenarios
| View file | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Field Definition & Validation
- Posts - Field Definition
- Posts - Scenarios
- Posts - Post Funding
- Posts - Consolidation
- Post - Funding Data Analysis
- Posts - Managing Deanery LETB to TIS Post Owner
- Posts - ERD
- Posts - Feedback
Description
The management of the establishment of posts in each local office area – links to approvals and funding.
Active Working
JIRA Tickets
...
For Discussion
...
| # | Question | Comment | Owner | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEW: ability to see historical posts against a programme [related to PROGRAMMES COMPONENT] is this something that we can add into an existing story, related to Programme & Curricula | I suggest creating a separate story for this IO - new story created
| Alex Dobre (Unlicensed) Reuben Noot (Deactivated) | ||||||||
| 2 | Tariff Rate reference data - how to manage knock on effect when this is changed? | The TariffRate reference data is sourced from vwPostFunding, depending on how this ReferenceData table is maintained going forward for updated Tariff rates will determine if a link between PostFunding and Tariff Reference data uses a technical key or a natural key to maintain the Tariff history for a post going forward. Further investigation of the PostFunding DR data, a Post can have more than 1 historic funding type assigned to it, so it's not just Tariffs being tracked via this table, see here for documented examples | Russell Steel (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 3 | Rule: Post views are not limited to local only < - can this be confirmed? | JW - No, on refection I suspect that we should limit to local view as we will still need a way to allow users to filter so that they see and can report on only the posts in their local office. IO - it may be possible to do this by location name, i.e. filter on XXX Local Office, rather than associated local office Alex Dobre (Unlicensed), Russell Steel (Unlicensed) can you please confirm this would be possible? Rule update: Default view to local office only | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 4 | TIS-12: Do we want to update to link / unlink posts and programmes? Update to align with correct format for whole | JW - Updated to reflect both the need to link and unlink posts to and from programmes | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 5 | TIS-14: is the story wording accurate? | Story seems ok. the 'so that' is perhaps a bit specific but it is the main reason to capture the info. Looks good to me to (JW) - perfectly accurate | |||||||||
| 6 | TIS-410: do we need a story about re-linking? | I think we do as this process is different to linking as you only need to change the programme post membership to 'current' from 'inactive'. is this correct ? JW - Interesting question. I think that the re-linking issue is just another version of the linking issue. We either link or unlink and as long as we can keep the history of when a post was linked to a programme then there isn't a need for a 'relink' story. Suspect that I could be looking at this in a too simplistic way so am happy to be corrected. IO - I'll add this to acceptance criteria, that it should be possible to link / un-link an infinite number of times | |||||||||
| 7 | TIS-12: do we need a story about unlinking programme and post? | Yes if we are going to set the post programme relationship to 'inactive' rather than completely remove it in order to retain the post programme membership history. | |||||||||
| 8 | TIS-13: is this still required, Reuben to confirm? | Just need to add 'Managing Local Office' to post form and this will be covered | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 9 | TIS-325: is this a valid MVP requirement? How do you envision this being displayed? filter, flag? etc? | This is just a report currently called the vacancy matrix. The requirement here is for admins to easily be able to see when a post is vacant but also to pull of a list of such posts. JW - I thought we had removed this story as when we went through the user journey there were three stories that were in essence the same (reporting on fil rates and vacancies - two sides of same coin). Think TIS-304 is the real MVP and this story is met via access settings. IO - I've written it so that the user can view and/or pull a specific report, the way reporting is organised as a component it may get lost otherwise | |||||||||
| 10 | TIS-651: is this part of the create post journey? Should it be mandatory? where post is for GP? | It is part of creating a post for GP posts based in a practice. Some local offices may manage this differently so not sure it should be mandatory. JW - not MVP as recording the trainer against a post cannot currently be done (info received from my GP colleague here in NE) I have removed the MVP tag | |||||||||
| 11 | TIS-381: is this a valid MVP requirement? How do you envision this being displayed? filter, flag? etc? | This requirement is a report or list again. it's basically saying users should be able to pull off lists of training posts as required. JW - I think this was one of the stories that was removed when we went through the post user journey along with TIS-325. TIS-304 covers this requirement too. | |||||||||
| 12 | TIS-10: is the wording of the story accurate? | JW - Yes, and the wording supports the most basic requirement of post funding which is that (a) is the post funded and (b) the funding stream e.g. tariff, trust etc. | |||||||||
| 13 | TIS-647: TBC how necessary this is for MVP (JW)? | JW - used by 7 local offices so is MVP | |||||||||
| 14 | TIS-628: This has been made an MVP story, even though there isn’t equivalent functionality now; is wording accurate, can we get an example into the ticket, it’s a sub-requirement of create post | JW - currently happens in Intrepid so is definitely MVP. Is one of the most basic and essential ones | |||||||||
| 15 | TIS-627: is this truly a an MVP requirement, is there any other way leave approver is defined (i.e. by person) and if so, do we need both? | Alistair Pringle (Unlicensed) is asking the East Midlands about this today as they are the ones who use on line leave management at its most enhanced functionality Yes, it is MVP as current functionality on Intrepid | |||||||||
| 16 | TIS-671: link old and new posts (because a post has been disestablished) | New story created | Ify | ||||||||
| 17 | TIS-672: ability to see historical programmes view against a post [POSTS] for discussion | New story created | Ify | ||||||||
| 18 | TIS-325: current holder not on validation table, can this be added? | Former user (Deleted) this has been superceded. i've set TIS-325 and TIS-381 to Not Required as both are covered under TIS-304. I've updated TIS-304 so it holds more detail | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 19 | TIS-381: how do users need to do this, new scenario needed (P-15)? Another report that sits under TIS-304? Acceptance criteria must be validated in JIRA (
| As above | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 20 | TIS-628: Is it definite that this should be editable? What's the real reason? | Good question Former user (Deleted) We requested this as users need to add a suffix of '/M' or '/SUP' etc. to denote a post is a military post or a supernumerary post as these are posts that are out of the ordinary and do not form part of the formal local office establishment of posts - they also tend to be funded via a different funding stream. IO - this seems like an additional requirement, ie users need to be able to add a suffix to denote millitary or supernumerary posts, rather than have the ability to edit the post number. If you're happy, I'll update the data table and story. Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 21 | TIS-627: has this been confirmed as MVP? | Former user (Deleted) I'll pick this up with East Midlands | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 22 | TIS-394: What's the sort criteria, filter criteria, default list view? | Sort and filter, see field validation Order of Columns 1, National Post Number 2. Site 3. Approved Grade 4. Specialty 5. Programme 6. Current Trainee (taken from placement history) 7. Funding Type 8. Status Default list view:
| Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||||||||
| 23 | TIS-667: what are the workflow steps? | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) |
Agreed Next Steps
...
NB: there are non-training posts which hold the same data fields as training posts | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) | ||
| 24 | What's the impact of not capturnig/displaying funding body against a post? See email from Lisa Woodland, 03 October 2017 | Not applicable | Joanne Watson (Unlicensed) |