- POs present a review of Sprint goals
- Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no more reference to specific list of Jira tickets, and no more reference to work not 'done')
- POs supported by Dev team provide narrative on why, and what, emergency work was brought into the Sprint and which committed-to tickets were moved out as a result
- Stakeholders / Users invited to query / interrogate / applaud (after Sprint Review POs convert consensus inputs into backlog tickets, giving the option to consider them in the coming Sprint Planning)
- POs present the roadmap
- Stakeholders / Users invited to comment and advise on any changes that should be considered (after Sprint Review, POs coordinate amendments to the roadmap)
Availability
(assume Team Availability Calendar is up to date, otherwise, everyone was available for 9 days of the Sprint
Full team availability 9-day Sprint * 10 dev team members | 90 days |
---|---|
Simon Jay Ashley | -9 days -3 days 0.5 days |
Total team absence | -12.5 days |
Sprint Priorities
The following list was the prioritisation output from Sprint Planning - largely a stabilisation Sprint:
- Adding Create|Edit|Delete elements to the Placement Planning Tool;
- Correcting Trust access roles;
- Consolidating Admins UI to Angular 5;
- Resolving Other Specialties bug
Contents
The following items to be shared by team members during this sprint review
| ||||
Item | TIS Ref / Owner | Status | Description of work Link. e.g. to working software https://apps.tis.nhs.uk/ (note: use Dev for obfuscated data) Loom video of completed work https://www.useloom.com/ | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge transfer: | ||||
|
| Ongoing | ||
Resource Planning: | Shortlisting Lead dev in Manchester and DevOps in London. FSD (Joseph) in London starting on 1 April. Current vacancies (including the above):Manchester: Lead Dev, FED, Junior Dev London: DevOps, FED |
Add Comment