Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 17 Next »


Currently

There are multiple ways of making a field or record unavailable within the TIS UI, the uses have not been applied consistently across the front end/back end, however the general summary is as follows:



Type Functional description for TIS Where used in TIS Warning/error messages in TIS Comments
1 Delete (status)

Users can apply a status of "delete" to a particular record, which would mean that the record would be deleted from the front end

  • applied at both record and field level
  • this acts as a soft delete
    • removed the field from the front end
    • does not de-link where applied
    • removes link ability for new scenarios

Example: People (Sensitive Data / Manage Record / Status)

  • People
  • Programmes
  • Posts
No error message displayed In intrepid, this flagged the applicable field or record for archiving in the back end but kept it in view on the UI.

Applicable to fields in ref table and records

Reversible
2 Inactive (status)

Users can apply a status of "Inactive" to a particular record or reference data field, which would mean that the record or field is made temporarily unavailable

  • can be applied at both record and field level
  • impact of applying this to a field being used in a current record, is
    • filtering may need to be applied to view the record in a list page i.e. To show both current and inactive records
    • drop downs for reference tables will not display anything that has been made with an inactive status
    • records containing inactive data will not be flagged, but editing may present errors to the user
    • assessment records may become legacy, and no editing will no longer be possible

Example: People records (People / Sensitive Data / Manage Record / Status)

  • People
  • Programmes
  • Posts
No error message displayed In Intrepid, this meant the applicable field/record would need to be activated (made current) before it could be used in a record

Applicable to fields in ref table and records

Reversible
3 Trash can

Users can click on the trash can next to a field and permanently remove data from TIS

  • this functions as a hard delete
  • removes existing linkages with records and other fields
  • No audit trail is kept of record/field

Example: Placement record (People / Placements / Placement list)

  • People: Placement
  • People: Programme Membership
"Are you sure you want to delete?" displayed N/A
4 Minus

Users can click on the minus sign next to a field and permanently remove it from TIS

  • this functions as a hard delete
  • removes existing linkages with records and other fields
  • No audit trail is kept of record/field

Example: Curricula (Programme / Curricula)

  • People: Qualifications
  • People: Programme Membership
  • Posts: Other specialties
  • Posts: Sub-specialties
  • Posts: Other grades
  • Posts: Other sites
  • Posts: Programme names
  • Programme: Curricula
No error message displayed N/A
5 X button

Users can click on the X sign next to a field and permanently remove it from TIS

  • this functions as a hard delete
  • removes existing linkages with records and other fields

Example: Roles field (People / Sensitive Data / Manage Records / Roles)

  • People: Roles
No error message displayed N/A
6 Dates from/to

Users can specify an end date, which would make the related record or fields Inactive after that date has elapsed

  • this functions as a hard delete
  • removes existing linkages with records and other fields

Example: Post funding (Posts / Post record / Funding)

  • People: Registration dates
  • People: Inactive date
  • People: Programme membership
No error message displayed Applied in addition to any status of current, inactive or delete - purely informational
7 Archive Not currently implemented in TIS
N/A N/A


Data implications
In terms of data being passed down to NDW, it is assumed that hard delete data is not passed on, but soft delete data is.

Going forward, all data should be passed on to NDW, but segregated from regular data in some way to support simple queries.


To Be

In order to consolidate the way that the concept of deletion is used across TIS, the following rules should be applied:


Delete status

  • remove “delete” as a status that can be applied in the FE across all fields and records
  • apply delete status in the BE only, in certain scenarios (see below)
  • display the fields with deleted status in the FE/BE audit logs
  • Allow NDW reporting for records with "delete" status

Example applicable scenarios

N/A - see Trash Can


Inactive status

  • this should be applied to the following to reference data fields and all record types
  • It should remove the ability to link to new records, however wxistinrecord linkages will remain unless edited
  • On edit, system should flag where there are records using/linked to this data that have a status of “current”
  • display which records are linked or using the data, line by line TBC if this is possible and how

Example applicable scenarios

  • records and fields that need to be temporarily retired
  • Reference data


Trash can (button)

  • this interaction type should be applied to all record types
  • this should act as a soft delete, and render the record/field as follows
    • remove the record or field completely from view in the FE
    • apply status “deleted” in the BE for audit purposes
  • display the deletion in audit log against the relevant user/record - this should also allow user to undo deletion
  • Do not allow deletion where linked child records / fields
  • Send deleted fields to NDW in segregated area to support reporting 

Example applicable scenarios

  • accidental creation of a record


Minus

  • this interaction should enable the removal of sub-sections to a record
  • this should act as a soft delete
    • remove the data from the FE
    • apply status of Delete in BE
  • keep a record of the change in the back end
  • display the deletion in audit log against the relevant user/record - this should also allow user to undo deletion
  • do not allow deletion where there are linked records
  • Send deleted fields to NDW in segregated area to support reporting 

Example applicable scenarios

  • accidental addition of a sub-section (e.g. placement or assessment to a Person) record
  • accidental addition of a curriculum to a Programme



X (button)

  • this interaction allows the removal of "multi-add" fields against a record
  • it should act as a soft delete
    • remove the data from the UI
    • apply status of Delete in BE
  • keep a record of the change in the back end
  • display the deletion in audit log against the relevant user/record - this should also allow user to undo deletion
  • Send deleted fields to NDW in segregated area to support reporting 

Example applicable scenarios

  • removal of roles against a person record
  • sites against a Post


Dates From/To

  • this interaction should trigger automatic status change to "inactive" or "current" dependent on when the dates lie in relation to "today's date"
  • it should act as a status change only
    • make applicable record "inactive" when end date passes today
    • Make applicable record "current" when start date passes today
    • keep the record in view within UI
  • keep a record of the change in the back end (accessible via audit logs)
  • Can be overridden manually by status change, 

Example applicable scearios

  • supervisor approvals
  • GMC/GDC/PH number validity



Archive REQUIRES FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH JW

  • this is required to enable permanent retirement of record types e.g. when a trainee record falls outside of the data retention period
  • this should be an automated process that triggers the following
    • change of status in BE that removes "Inactive" trainees after a defined duration has elapsed  e.g. 7 years from their programme end date
    • remove view of the record in the FE
    • notify users in bulk of records that have been archived
    • apply status "archive"
  • all archived data should be retrievable via NDW

Applicable scenarios

  • where data needs to be retired relating to Trainee records (after 10 years have elapsed)




# Question Comments
1 Other than reference date and records (forms), is there anywhere else, or data type, that it should be possible to apply inactive as a status?
2 Other than within record, are there other scenarios you might want to delete (trashcan) a data entity? for example, particular fields?
3

Deleting programme membership or curriculum membership current behaviour. Think these are hard deletes too, should they be? If so, do we currently audit the deletion of these? Requires technical design guidance as to what a consistent delete on TIS should be.


4 What are archiving rules regarding elapsed time and what can/cannot be stored?
5 What data will need to be accesible (GDPR) and for how long?
6 Are there any notifications we need to provide to users / trainees regarding the editing/deleting/archiving of their data?




  • No labels