Welcome
- out loud on the call - really, we’d appreciate you doing this!; |
|---|
Live Issues:
Incident logs |
Dev team demo 'done' work contributing to those goals (no reference to specific Jira tickets, and no reference to work not 'done')
Area | Description | Team Representative | Demo - from Prod URL where feasible |
|---|---|---|---|
Trainee Self-service (TSS) | |||
Revalidation | Map GMC Status to TIS outcomes |  
| |
Production use of Reval | |||
Trainee Information System (TIS) | Remove Validation on Qualifications' Medical School |  https://apps.tis.nhs.uk/admin/people/person/279584/edit-qualifications https://stage-apps.tis.nhs.uk/admin/people/person/47165/edit-qualifications | |
Fix: set curriculumMembership ID as programmeMembership ID for assessment | Quick explanation. | ||
Rework available placement grade | This is the first step on a larger piece of work to clean up the grades associated with posts and placements. Placement grades previously defaulted to the approved grade of the applicable post, but any of the ‘Other’ grades for the post could be used as well. As any current grade can be associated with a post, and hence with a placement, a number of inappropriate non-training / non-placement grades are in use, as well as now-inactive grades. This initial work allows only a limited selection of placement grades to be associated with new or edited placements, regardless of the placement post. Existing placement grades are unaffected. Subsequent work will apply similar restrictions to the selection of grades for creating or editing posts themselves, and after existing post grades have been reviewed and cleaned, placement grade selection will once again be limited to the particular subset of appropriate placement grades associated with their post. | ||
Electronic Staff Record (ESR) | |||
Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency (NIMDTA) | |||
Objective Key Results (OKRs) 2021/22 Q3:
OKR | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th (Xmas) |
Objective: Complete the TSS 2nd pilot and release Reval MVP | |||||||
Key Result#1: Negative TSS User feedback declines as a proportion of overall feedback | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | ||||
Key Result#2: Number of users that have authenticated and submitted their Form R using TSS exceeds 90% of pilot Trainees | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | ||||
Key Result#3: All Reval Admins switch to using Reval rather than GMC for Recommendations | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||
TIS team development (following external review)
Last Review I highlighted that we recently had an external review of how we work within the TIS team. From that review, a number of recommendations were put forward for how we can alter things going forward. The whole team is actively working towards implementing these recommendations. As we are a team that at its core believes in transparency and openness, we decided to give you a flavour of what we have been working on:
Up to end of Iteration # 3
We've created and published a Team charter
We're about to hire a User Researcher, and are looking at the team needs in terms of other Digital, Data and Technology (DDaT) professions
We're reviewing all our meetings and events with a view to rationalising them in the near future
We're embarking on team training in User-Centred Design: Online, 15hrs over 5 days | On-site at one of our offices, 1 day
During Iteration #4
.
TIS interim roadmap:
Feedback
We really do welcome any feedback you have for us - whether it be negative or positive, or whether it be a suggestion of something we could try/incorporate in a future Review. We absolutely don’t want to stand still. We’re very happy applying the 12th Agile principle of ‘becoming more productive’ to our Reviews themselves! Your contributions to this survey are entirely anonymous, should you wish to include anything others might perceive as controversial. We welcome any and all feedback, as long as it is constructive!
Post-Review survey: https://healtheducationyh.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/tis-review-2021-2-q3-iteration4 |
|---|
Add Comment