Page content:
| Table of Contents |
|---|
...
Field Validation (Part B) - Trainee UI - Field Validation | Form R (Part B)
Display additional fields to trainees - 14/07
Background:
To be able to give trainees more context of what they are doing in terms of programmes and specialty at their placements.
To be able to see the level of detail that is provided in the mail merge currently. It’s currently a manual task in order to select which programmes the specific info can be shared with the trainees.
Fields:
Placement > Other specialty/ies → Check if already in the TSS sync
Displaying this to the trainee helps with additional info
Other site/s → Check if already in the TSS sync
Used to Overwrite the placement site
Used as an additional site to the placement
Displaying this might cause confusion to the trainees. (Hospital based specialties OK).
Check Placement> Other sites v.s. Post>Other Sites and which one to display to the trainees.
Sub Spec/s→ Check if already in the TSS sync
Displaying this would fit the neonates additional info currently added to the Training Description
Impact to display this for all LOs is minimal
Training Description - At Post level - Freetext → Need to be rationalised/discussion
Placement comments - At Placement level - Freetext → Need to be rationalised/discussion
Trainee Notes → New text Field as a suggestion
Questions:
Question | Comments |
|---|---|
What is Training Description capturing at the moment and what should it be used for? |
|
Is there a need to create a new field to capture the ‘Unofficial Sub-specialty’ e.g. neonatal, if so, what should it be called/recorded as on TIS? |
|
Is this field specific to a trainee, or every trainees against the post should have the same ‘Unofficial Sub-specialty’ |
|
Should the ‘Unofficial sub-specialties’ be part of the actual list of Sub-specialties? (should they be included in the NHS occupation codes/GMC list?) |
|
Should this field be captured at post or placement level? |
|