29/06/2020

Working Group

TIS: @Alistair Pringle (Unlicensed)@Ashley Ransoo , @Adewale Adekoya, @James Harris @Sebastian Kwok (Unlicensed)

South: @Sue Barrand (Unlicensed)@Mike.Richardson (Unlicensed)

North East, North West and YH: @David Short (Unlicensed)@Andrew.Crozier (Unlicensed)@Liam.Lofthouse (Unlicensed) , @Helan Raynor (Unlicensed)

London/KSS/SE: @Chris Norman (Unlicensed)@Maria Kist (Unlicensed) @Sarah Krause

East of England, Midlands: @Gwilym Williams (Unlicensed) @Caroline Grisdale

Discussion/Action

Link to Metabase dashboard for data quality issues to resolve - https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/dashboard/18

#

Discussion/Action

Responsible

Outcome

Status

#

Discussion/Action

Responsible

Outcome

Status

1

Resolve Duplicates - TISDEV-4841: Resolve the duplicate invalid GMC numbers, such as 'Retired,' and make them 'UNKNOWN'

Data leads

First discussed on DQ on 04/06: 

08/01: TISNEW-2364-Merging, then removal of Duplicate Person Records - Round 1DONE - Work completed for Round 1 on Stage and testing began. Since this was a flyway script, the importance was stressed on completion of the testing on stage as this would block anything else from being released to Production in out release pipeline

DS: Has done some testing. SB: leave manager tests carried out. JH/DS/AH: re-use some of the scripts that were used during consolidation for testing on metabase for next week.

DS: Prog membership, placements and assessments - Looks good so far. 

How long more this would need? - conclude by Wed 16/01.( and  are going to test this on Wednesday afternoon)

21/09: The scripts have been run on Prod over the weekend.

has taken extracts of the data on Friday afternoon ahead of the scripts being run. 

4/02: Round two will be needed. LaSE still to advise DS on what to do with the records that weren't an easy match. Chris picking this up - London may be ok but KSS need more attention

4/02: Leave manager - need to do checks for the circa 500 records to make sure that the round 2 de-duping would not leave orphaned records (as per the procedure for Round 1

01/04:

to provide the list of Id's/template for the second round of duplication (second strongest match rule). To send the list out to all regions be checked. Jen would have done for the South - to be checked?

15/04: Still awaiting for EMD, South and London.

24/06: Jen to speak to David tomorrow (25th) re queries she has found in the South. 

James to ask Gwil where has gotten to with this - returns from leave on the 1st July

08/07: David to resend file to Gwil and Jen is no longer confused   as she now understands that this part of the exercise will not remove ALL erroneous records. Work is continuing........

22/07: Ongoing, waiting for South and EMD data

02/09 EM have submitted, awaiting the South (ongoing)

14/10: Back with DS - to compare and rebuild the new list of what's been merged

  • Might be useful for bringing in the Northern Ireland data into TIS (@Adewale Adekoya

11/11: Completed by South. With David at the moment.

09/12: There will be some duplicates because of Study Leave. The merging would have to be done at some point on TIS. Almost ready to go. 

06/01: DS post on slack for additional feedback.

03/02: DS posted on slack for everyone else to confirm this is OK. (De-dupe Round 2 spreadsheet)

20/04: Recommendation: to be done ahead of Northern Ireland and HCS onboarding onto TIS.

  • Aim for May 2020

04/05:

  • Mids & East

  • North

  • South (requested a report from Hicom re People Id’s that relates to TIS Person ID’s) - To then check against David’s SS

  • London

20/05: Round 2 de-duplication file -

We can go ahead and de-duplicate the records identified (~20) @David Short (Unlicensed) to share those records, @Ashley Ransoo @James Harris @Sebastian Kwok (Unlicensed) create ticket for Round 2.

Some coordination with Hicom after the bulk has been done.

03/06: Dig out the template/ticket and the script for refinement. (@David Short (Unlicensed) @Ashley Ransoo)

Iteration 1: Exclude Hicom Records

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-4705

Iteration 2: Hicom records only

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-4871

Ticket @Ashley Ransoo

15/06: Template in TIS format expected by end today.

29/06: Sue: Hicom sent over a national list (personTISIds) of ~18 approvers to exclude in the merge. (Based on anyone that has ever approved a study leave application). Some coordination with Hicom for these records. The list on Slack to go first iteration excluding these 18 records. Second iteration look at the Hicom coord. ones. Sue to check against the master file.

29/06: Received and ticket updated.



2

Identification and removal of Consultant data on TIS

All

Removal of consultant data has a dependency on De-duplication work.

22/10: Dependency on the De-dupe work. Follow up with Chris after the de-dupe work has taken place. This is to identify which Consultant data belongs to which Trust so that they can have this if the trust wants.

29/10: Linked to the removal of the consultant information from TIS we also need to address the issue of the non-trainee posts. So a further piece of work needs to take place to identify and hard delete these posts. Will need to take a copy of this so that (like with the non-trainee records) we can pass this to the trusts if needed. JW to create ticket related to the deletion of posts.

19/11 - Once de-dupe is done, check the full list of People from Chris. Please review against the surviving records (IDs) onTISNEW-2057.

14/01: Wait until the testing of the de-dupe has been done on stage then carry on.- 

04/02: Awaiting on DS on testing outcome for TISNEW-2057 to prioritise TISNEW-2083. Does the script attached to 2083 has everything? 

Check with Rob about urgency of this re IG - JW to do this

01/04: to check with Rob/Ben.

15/04: response from Rob 'From an IG perspective - of we don't need it then we should not keep it.'

Supervisors and Leave approvers taken into account on Chris's script.

24/06: The South has undertaken a post audit and set to Inactive Consultant/non current posts which has resulted in a reduction of approx. 2000 posts

Suggestion that this is something that the other three regions can do while the Person de-dup is in the process of being completed.

Suspect most of the Consultant posts in the North and Mids and East are now inactive meaning that the majority of outstanding posts belong to KSS (possibly)

Once this has been completed for Posts they can remain as Inactive rather than undertake another unnecessary step.

22/07: Still waiting on the de-duplication work. To discuss about Supervisors after this piece of work.

17/02: Intrepid/Leave Manager roles to be sorted out ahead of de-dupe of consultants on TIS

20/04:

  • Aim for May 2020.

  • Action: Investigating Chris’s script, check for any leave manager records.

04/05: Report has been amended - Query saved on Data warehouse. Exclude list of Approvers before removing.

21/05: Update from the south and EM.

03/06: Waiting on Hicom.

29/06: Sue: Hicom sent over a national list (personTISIds) of ~18 approvers to exclude in the merge. (Based on anyone that has ever approved a study leave application). Some coordination with Hicom for these records. The list on Slack to go first iteration excluding these 18 records. Second iteration look at the Hicom coord. ones. Sue to check against the master file.

 

On hold until Point 1 has been completed to the group's satisfaction for People area

3

Sites created with Trust code. Trust codes are not unique. 



01/03/2019: Tom De Salis:

Cleansing the NTS data revealed the fact that 3 of our CCGs merged into a super-CCG last year, which means their sites have the wrong Trust/Trust code on TIS. This is an issue on both the Site reference table and on all the posts related to these sites. It affects around 100 sites.

  1. Do we know when the post update tool might be available to update the posts? Is it worth waiting?

  2. Would we be able to do an update on the back-end to the site reference table?

AR:  Site is linked to Trust via the TrustId. When creating a Site, a valid Trust Code is entered and the Trust ID is fetched from the Trust reference table to attach to the Site. 

However, since the Trust Code is not currently unique in the Trust reference table, the site might be linked to incorrect Trusts.

E.g. Trust Code RQ3:

Trust Code VTS:

Are these sites linked to the correct trusts?

01/04: Check if the FE is displaying INACTIVE values when creating site. Need to understand what the problem is.

to speak to Tom de Salis/invite him to the next data leads call . 

  • Raise a ticket to get the Trust search behave as the Site Search.

  • list posted on DQ channel to be discussed.

15/04:

  • Identify duplicate Sites (Site codes not unique) in Site Reference Table- 

  • Identify duplicate Trusts codes in Trust reference table

  • Identify association between Current Sites to Inactive Trusts

  • Each Region data Lead to review on DQ channel.

24/06: Regions to act on report created by Chris. Not for immediate attention due to the current work ongoing in Local Offices.

19/08: Ongoing

07/11/2019 Similar issue raised Lynn Bradley team https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3571 another ticket raised for all duplicate trust code https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3577

  • Mids and East -

  • South - Ongoing

  • North -  Ongoing

  • London - 

11/11: Post the spreadsheet on DQ channel to sort out the duplicate Trusts codes and ensure 1 only is CURRENT for each code. 

Trusts do not have Local Office boundaries, owner field can be ignored. 

03/02: Inactivate and ensure only unique trust codes are left

  • London: In progress, with Maria K

  • North: In progress

  • South: In progress

  • Midlands and East: Done

20/04: Check if there are still records on metabase.@Ashley Ransoo / @James Harris

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/316

Not for immediate attention as priority in LOs is August intake and ARCPS

4

Posts with no Employing bodies or Training bodies and are current

All

In relation to the above, we are also discussing in making the Employing and Training bodies mandatory on Posts. The following posts are CURRENT on TIS and have with either a missing Employing body or Training body, or both. Can you check and update those posts as required, please? The TIS bulk post update tool should support that.
https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/301

09/12:

  • Mids and East -

  • North - 

  • South - In Progress

  • London - 

TIS ticket to make mandatoryhttps://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-365403/02: Look a the percentage left without one. James to pick up with Chris. 

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/302

04/05:

03/06:

  • South -

  • Mids & East - In progress

  • London - Update separately @James Harris

  • North - In progress (focus is on NE) - 1/2 left

20/04: This will be prioritised above #7 due to issues caused to Finance.

  • Use ‘Undefined’ for OOPs.

20/05: Use the TIS Post Bulk Update tool to update the posts. Ticket in sprint planning and likely to go into the next sprint starting on 27/05.

29/06: Can be closed.

CLOSED

5

Programmes and rotations on TIS which are current but do not seem to being used and need to be inactivated.

All

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/320
https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/321

20/05: GW suggestion to look at what GMC approved programmes are per site before inactivating

03/06:

  • M&E: Programmes with no approved sites to be identified,

  • South: All blank rotations deleted/inactivated

  • London/KSS:

  • North:

Impact of inactivating Rotations associated with Programmes on Posts. Rotations are associated to Programmes and to Posts.

15/06:

We will need to supply a list of Programmes to Hicom to add to Oriel as part of Oriel 2 development to facilitate the ingestion of trainees between the Oriel and TIS.

 

 

6

List of curricula that we could bulk inactivate

All 

James: I have started compiling a list of curricula that we could bulk inactivate when we are ready link is https://healtheducationengland.sharepoint.com/:x:/s/ProgrammesAnalysisTeam-MaE/EYOGs7vMqntKim8ycVrduwwBxVi8ktOmu8NhDyORj8VjQg?e=vKD255
We will also need to check Leads to CCT and there is a Child and Adolescent Run-Through curricula with no Curriculum Sub-Type. I assume that will be Medical Curriculum?
There's an action column in column A

09/12:

05/04: Report to be created on metabase @James Harris

Logic to be confirmed - @Mike.Richardson (Unlicensed) @Sue Barrand (Unlicensed)

  • Mids and East - 

  • North - 

  • South - 

  • London - 

Ticket with list to make inactive with logic confirmed

Ticket https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3386 : - Only make Current curricula available for creating/updating programme memberships with.

03/12: POG to be made 0 on all curriculum. 

17/02: Same validation to be applied via bulk - https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3888

03/06: Ticket for Curricula to bulk inactivate - @Ashley Ransoo

  • Keep outide of PAG, handle within this group.

15/06: We’ve inactivated 144 curricula on Stage and Prod. James suggested we inactivate the curriculum first and later look at other stuff as need to check what issues that would cause.

Mike: In the South we have 250 trainees in legacy curricula & 300 assessments against them. We will be able to get them changed to non-legacy curricula but it's worth mentioning that removing a curriculum from a programme will also remove the curriculum from any assessment made against it, so those will need to be updated too. (cc @Sue Barrand) (edited) 

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/327

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/326

15/06: 144 of them have been inactivated. There seems to be lots of new records added with legacy. After the ARCP seasons completed (July 20th - 4th Aug 2020) i.e. by end of July, to inactivate the remaining ones.

Caroline - Check those that have been bulk uploaded recently (GIM)

Mike - Check those that have been bulk uploaded recently

Add Start date to query 327.

Check Bulk Upload validating correctly? - https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3888

There will still be some that are legacy but no ‘legacy’ in their names that would need inactivating (smaller no.).

29/06: POG removed to stop auto-calculation on prog/curr membership.



7

Issues around unique site codes

All

Branch sites.docx

09/12:

  • Are Site Code and Site number the same for all site records - report?

  • Site code is not unique on TIS - should this be?

  • Can/Should one of  Site code or Site number be unique? Therefore serve the purpose of branch sites for recording the branch code

  • An investigation into the ODS list, to get the ODS list into the NDW.

16/12:

Further discussions on #dataleads

  • 20/04: Code to TIS_Interim and send to NDW.Add SiteCode to TIS_Interim and send to NDW.

20/04: Will be discussed next at PAG.

04/05: Site code added to NDW.

  • Is the branch code in the dataset from the API? - @James Harris to do some mining.



8

Programme memberships with invalid or null dates

All

31/12:

We are working on a ticket in current sprint to set the Status field (Now Training Status) based on the programme membership. 

There are a number of programme memberships where we cannot set this at the moment as they have either missing start/end dates or the end date is greater than start date, and as such are invalid. Can the below be looked at by data leads for their respective regions: 

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/296 - add TIS Person ID

17/02: Some of those would not be corrected, old data. 

  • Hicom ETLs

Ticket to turn Training Status to INACTIVE on retrospective trainee records with no prog. mem. -



9

Record Status > Training Status field



All

03/01:

It appears that some Local Offices have been using this field to record Trainers approval. 

It was agreed at PAG for this field to be auto-populated based on trainee being on a current/inactive programme membership. 

Any impact on Leave manager / Accent and NDW reporting?

06/01:

  • Mismatch of status between the list view and detail view

  • List of Roles for Accent - Sue to provide

03/02: 

Trainers status have been migrated to the new Trainers Approval area on TIS within the Approval Status.

All trainers have been given a status of CURRENT with empty start and end dates, the idea being to have a bulk tool to update those and make the status calculated in the future. 

20/04: Bulk People Update based on TIS Person ID coming in the next sprint.



10

Updating of Reference tables

Data leads

Who should be able to update what?

E.g. Specialty list being updated without other Local Offices knowing, impacts on all records linked to that reference value. 

Should there be category/group of reference lists that can only be updated by specific people/roles/data leads on TIS or an outside business process to agree who does the update for such references.

ticket to support updating the remaining post and stop the wiping out of the specialty on the associated fields. 

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-385403/02: Ticket to restrict all except Site, Trusts, Programmes. - @Ashley Ransoo@James Harris

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-3887There are a number of HEE TIS Admin that needs tidying up. This is the role that will have the permissions left on to manage all reference tables. 

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/294

20/04: The fix for the bug has been pushed to Prod. Gastro-enterology changed to Gastroenterology.

Look at defining Reference tables for TIS:

Reference Data



11

Assessment Bulk Update tool on TIS

All

Review Columns, validations and rules for a proposed Bulk Assessments Update tool using TIS_Assessment_ID's:

Assessment - Bulk Uploads

17/02: 

Data leads to review and feed back.



12

Site Approvals Bulk Upload on TIS

All

Fields to review and feedback

Approvals - Field Validation#FieldValidation-BulkUploadSiteApprovalsColumnHeaders



13

Recording Programme Curriculum Type on TIS

All/James

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-4389

Background
Trainees can be dual accredited in a main specialty and a secondary specialty when following a training programme. They will be able to gain CCT in both specialties. There is currently no way of identifying the main and secondary specialty on the programme curriculum attached to a Programme.
Examples of dual training - https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-list-of-approved-dual-cct-pairings-october-2017_pdf-72297006.pdf

There is a requirement from GMC to be record this consistently and therefore be able to run reports on this information.

Programme Curriculum Types - GMC Approved
https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/curricula#subspecialties
https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/how-we-quality-assure/royal-colleges-and-faculties

  • Specialty 1 → Primary Specialty

  • Specialty 2 → Dual Specialty

  • Sub Specialty

  • Academic Component

We need to be able to record the above and send to the National Datawarehouse for reporting purposes.

P.S: The terminology of the Programme Curriculum Types need to be discussed with Data leads - 04/05 - confirmed as above



14

Email address not being unique

Gwil/All

  • Impact of this issue

  • Impact on Trainee UI email address

  • Look at validations on TIS to make this unique

 

15

Covid Self Declaration Form

All

To be recorded against Placements comments.

Placement comments get removed and replaced with the values on update template that can be downloaded from TIS.

If previous comments are to be kept, download report with current comments and add to that with a prefix of “COVID-19”

 

16

Trusts accounts Auditing on TIS

Rob/Alistair/All/IG

Which accounts are still being used?

Simon/Ashley has created a report of last logged in users by roles on TIS.

Users that are using Tableau might not have necessarily logged in on TIS.

03/06: There is a way to find out last logged in date on Tableau. - Use this to cross reference the two reports. (@James Harris )

  • Should the auditing of Trusts sit within Data leads? (TIS?/DLs?/PAG being most appropriate) - Feedback to Alistair.

 

17

WTE > 1 on Trainee Placements

 

To agree some rules on what to change the non-trainee placements to.

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/323

03/06: When there is downstream impact on NDW, to have a process in place to check between the 2 teams. Use the TIS Tech Share session (1st Thursday of every sprint). (e.g. London downstream processes and impacts)

  • Consider if we need to have an approach to archive consultant data first, then take a look at the rest.

 

18

North West Dental Data

 

Doing a post redistribution of Dental Posts. No current DFT data in NorthWest.

  • @David Short (Unlicensed) to have a look and give a ball park estimate to feedback to James.

  • 15/06: James providing this tomorrow.

  • To raise with TOG if doesn’t get sorted.

 

19

Recording of ‘Main Programme’ in ACCS Posts to aide reporting

 

ACCS posts require multiple programmes attached. This causes duplicates when running reports on post numbers. Suggestion from PAG is to record ‘Main ACCS Theme/Programme’ in a field against these posts, e.g. PostFamily.

  • Take it back to PAG - what reporting issue are you trying to solve?

 

20

CURRENT Posts with white spaces in NPNs

All

There are about 50 posts on TIS that have been created with spaces in their NPNs (leading/trailing/extra white space)

This ticket is to prevent this from happening in future edits/creates:

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-4707

However, the existing posts that need sorting out are here:

https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/325

 

21

Adding/Amending Trusts - Mergers in the South

Sue/All

https://hee-tis.atlassian.net/browse/TISNEW-4721

  • If the above ticket is not done in time, we’ll need a manual refresh in UM scheduled with devs.

Programme in UM - Refreshed as and when a change is made.

 

 

22

Bulk People Update - Update and replace all v.s Update

All

Although we've discussed this on our data leads calls previously re the trainer approvals roles and how it would behave on bulk people update(new) v.s. bulk people upload(existing), we'd like to add this as an item to review with you :

People Upload (Existing):

  • Roles are added in addition the existing roles, Trainer approval tab becomes available if one of the 3 categories of roles (Educational Sup./Clinical Sup./Leave Mgr.) is added with using the template

  • If an existing person on TIS, the people upload act as an update and add any new role/s from the template; if one of the role is (ES/CS/LM), then trainer approval tab becomes available

  • You cannot add the trainer approval details from this template, e.g. start/end date, trainer status

People Update (new):

  • All existing roles wiped off and replaced with the one/s from the template specified in 'Role' column

  • If person had an existing (ES/CS/LM) role on TIS, and user has entered in a non-(ES/CS/LM) role on this template, it will wipe off the existing role/s, remove the trainer approval tab and trainer info from that person

  • If person had an existing (ES/CS/LM) role on TIS, and user has entered in a (ES/CS/LM) role on this template, it will wipe off the existing role/s, remove the trainer approval tab and trainer info from that person, re-create the trainer approval tab with the data specified on the start/end/trainer status columns from this template; if no data specified in the start/end/trainer status columns trainer approval tab is still created but will be empty

 

23

Null NTN and Training Pathways from TIS.

All

An issue was raised recently about the suffix missing from some NTNs. This is caused by the TrainingPathway being NULL (No Value Provided on the FE).

The reason for this is the TrainingPathway auto-calc was only added to the bulk upload in December 2019 which is why the vast majority of these are Feb starters.

Also, TrainingPathway only recalculates if the curriculum is changed, not if any other field is amended such as the StartDate (also not if the value had been changed to CESR). Therefore, if a trainee was uploaded prior to December 2019 and then deferred say to August for example, there TrainingPathway would not auto-calculate.We thought your local teams might need to go and enter a value for these trainees so have produced a metabase question to identify them. It's written in TIS_Interim so you can copy the SQL and run in the NDW if you prefer.


https://build.tis.nhs.uk/metabase/question/332

 

24

3 Large Trusts reported missing trainees - ESR. (Mainly Foundation Trainees for South)

Mike SOUTH/WMD/NE/YH

Is it volume related for August rotations?

Discussion at 4p.m. today.

 

 

Jira Tickets (Reference Tables)

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh