Sprint 61 Review (2018-11-14)

Availability

(assume Team Availability Calendar is up to date, otherwise, everyone was available for 9 days)

Alistair

Ashley

Chris

Matt

Panos

Roope

Shivani

Simon

-2

-1

-2

-1

-1

-1

-5

-1



Sprint Priorities

The following list was the prioritisation output from Sprint Planning - largely a stabilisation Sprint:

  1. Post funding
  2. AKS on Azure
  3. Access role on Programme
  4. Addressing a variety of tech debt to reduce frequency of distractions from further development



Contents

The following items to be shared by team members during this sprint review

Item

TIS Ref / Owner

Status

Description of work

Link. e.g. to working software https://apps.tis.nhs.uk/
(note: use Dev for obfuscated data)
Loom video of completed work https://www.useloom.com/

Production Application releases / updates

Anyone in the team now we have the new pipeline!


Assign fix number in Jira for anything committed - so POs have a record of each Sprint's releases (even though they are done incrementally throughout the Sprint).

Bugs

Stories







key summary type assignee status business value story points (effort) priority (bv*sp)
Loading...
Refresh

Technical debt & Non-functional requirements:
















Knowledge transfer:

  1. Confluence housekeeping - especially deleting documentation that is out of date. Ongoing
  2. Dev standards (Dev meeting / series of meetings). Ongoing
  3. Pairing / Mobbing
  4. Git-commit messages
  5. Walk-throughs (prep as you go - links?). 
  6. Architectural level diagrams
  7. UX Prototype - User feedback updates
  1. Andy Nash (Unlicensed)


  2. All Dev team
  3. Paul Hoang (Unlicensed) leading
  4. All Dev team
  5. All Dev team
  6. All Dev team
  7. Matt Leech (Unlicensed)

Ongoing










  1. Making some progress - but still finishing off...
    TIS21 Confluence Space







    Prototype: https://invis.io/VKOZKR3QR7C#/329488353_People-Table-Search






Resource Planning:

Andy Nash (Unlicensed)

Eniola Agbeti (Unlicensed)


6 new adverts have gone on the HEE website, and Healthjobs. 6-7 agencies have been approached to help source candidates.

Many thanks to those in the team that came forward to assist with getting everything in place in order to help ensure this round of recruitment got off to the best start possible:

  • we now have 2 page clear, concise and consistent job summaries for each role (DevOps, FSD, FED - all London; Lead Dev, FSD, FED - all Manchester), and
  • we have a list of places to go to advertise the roles (other than hoping candidates will come to the HEE website to find a role), and spread the word.

Next up, reviewing CVs, shortlisting and interviewing. Then reviewing our approaching to testing candidate competence

Then we also need to determine whether we can tidy up the underlying JDs which no longer really reflect the nature of the role, but do so without compromising the job grading (as any change to a JD may do).